Supplementary Materials

The PDF file includes:

  • Fig. S1. Comparison of conventional pathology and CytoPAN.
  • Fig. S2. CytoPAN readouts for comixtures of benign and malignant cells.
  • Fig. S3. Decision tree algorithm to classify cell populations.
  • Fig. S4. Selection of optimal fixation methods for FNA specimen.
  • Fig. S5. Selection of optimal permeabilization methods.
  • Fig. S6. Comparison of direct staining (one-step) and indirect staining (two-step).
  • Fig. S7. Stability test for lyophilized antibodies.
  • Fig. S8. Bleed-through analyses and signal deconvolution.
  • Fig. S9. CytoPAN user interface.
  • Fig. S10. System characterization.
  • Fig. S11. Comparison of CytoPAN and flow cytometry for different cell lines.
  • Fig. S12. Comparison of CytoPAN and flow cytometry for repeat FNA from mice bearing four different breast tumor types.
  • Fig. S13. Statistical analyses to determine cutoffs.
  • Fig. S14. Quad as a cancer marker.
  • Table S1. Pairs of primary and fluorophore-conjugated, species-specific secondary antibodies used in the study.
  • Table S2. Cost of CytoPAN device.
  • Table S3. Antibody list and cost for human samples.
  • Table S4. Summary of patient cohort.

[Download PDF]

Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following: