Research ArticleImmunotherapy

Regional delivery of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cell therapy generates potent and long-lasting CD4-dependent tumor immunity

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Translational Medicine  05 Nov 2014:
Vol. 6, Issue 261, pp. 261ra151
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010162


Translating the recent success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for hematological malignancies to solid tumors will necessitate overcoming several obstacles, including inefficient T cell tumor infiltration and insufficient functional persistence. Taking advantage of an orthotopic model that faithfully mimics human pleural malignancy, we evaluated two routes of administration of mesothelin-targeted T cells using the M28z CAR. We found that intrapleurally administered CAR T cells vastly outperformed systemically infused T cells, requiring 30-fold fewer M28z T cells to induce long-term complete remissions. After intrapleural T cell administration, prompt in vivo antigen-induced T cell activation allowed robust CAR T cell expansion and effector differentiation, resulting in enhanced antitumor efficacy and functional T cell persistence for 200 days. Regional T cell administration also promoted efficient elimination of extrathoracic tumor sites. This therapeutic efficacy was dependent on early CD4+ T cell activation associated with a higher intratumoral CD4/CD8 cell ratios and CD28-dependent CD4+ T cell–mediated cytotoxicity. In contrast, intravenously delivered CAR T cells, even when accumulated at equivalent numbers in the pleural tumor, did not achieve comparable activation, tumor eradication, or persistence. The ability of intrapleurally administered T cells to circulate and persist supports the concept of delivering optimal CAR T cell therapy through “regional distribution centers.” On the basis of these results, we are opening a phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the safety of intrapleural administration of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells in patients with primary or secondary pleural malignancies.


Pleural malignancies, both primary [malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)] and metastatic (from lung and breast cancers), affect more than 150,000 patients per year in the United States alone (1). MPM is a regionally aggressive disease with limited treatment options (2). We and others have reported on the better prognosis of having higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in MPM (36), suggesting that T cell–based immunotherapy may be beneficial to patients with MPM (7).

Targeted immunotherapies using chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) to redirect and reprogram patient T cells have recently shown encouraging results in some B cell malignancies, especially acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (811). CARs are synthetic receptors that retarget T cells to tumor surface antigens (12, 13). The advent of second-generation CARs, which combine activating and costimulatory signaling domains, has enabled the design of potent T cells that can mediate complete responses in patients with chemo-refractory CD19+ malignancies (811). The therapeutic potential of CAR therapies against solid cancers remains unknown. One critical aspect of devising a CAR therapy for any solid tumor is the identification of a valid target antigen. Mesothelin (MSLN) is a cell surface molecule associated with regional invasion, a characteristic of MPM where it is overexpressed in more than 90% of epithelioid MPM (14). In our clinicopathological studies systematically evaluating MSLN expression and intensity, we found strong to intermediate MSLN expression in 69% of lung adenocarcinomas (n = 1209) (15), 36% of triple-negative breast cancers (n = 355), and 46% of esophageal adenocarcinomas (n = 125) (16). MSLN expression was consistently associated with tumor aggressiveness and decreased survival (1416). Collectively, these observations support targeting MSLN in MPM and other solid cancers (7, 1719).

Mesothelin-targeted CARs have previously shown activity in a subcutaneous model of mesothelioma (2022). Targeted T cell therapies have, however, not been studied in orthotopic models. To this end, we established a clinically relevant MPM mouse model that recapitulates characteristic features of the human disease (14, 23, 24). The established pleural tumors encase lung and mediastinal structures with regional invasion, show extensive lymphangiogenesis, and develop mediastinal lymph node metastases. In this model, we not only addressed whether CAR T cells could eradicate tumor but also studied two potential routes of T cell administration: the conventional systemic intravenous and regional intrapleural administration. We hypothesized that systemic delivery may be superior owing to better infiltration of diffuse pleural disease, mediastinal lymph nodes, and occasional metastatic sites, which we could model. To our surprise, we found that regional, that is, intrapleural, T cell administration was vastly superior not only against pleural disease but also against disseminated tumor sites. This observation prompted us to investigate the basis for such therapeutic efficacy.

Here, we report the therapeutic potential of regional CAR T cell therapy for solid tumors and underscore the importance of early-antigen activation of CD4+ CAR T cells to achieve enhanced antitumor efficacy. Furthermore, our findings, which demonstrate the clear benefit of regional therapy in a clinically relevant disease model, are immediately translatable for the treatment of MPM and metastatic pleural tumors.


Mz- and M28z-transduced T cells specifically respond to MSLN+ target cells

We constructed two CARs incorporating a human MSLN–specific scFv (25) and either CD3ζ or CD28/CD3ζ signaling domains (Mz and M28z; Fig. 1A). The P28z CAR, specific for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (26), served as a negative control for alloreactivity and xenoreactivity. Both CD4+ and CD8+ human peripheral blood T lymphocytes were effectively transduced using the SFG γ-retroviral vector (60 to 75% transduction; fig. S1A). MSLN-transduced MSTO-211H (MSLN+) and PSMA-transduced EL4 mouse lymphoma cells (MSLN) provided MSLN+ and MSLN targets used for in vitro experiments (fig. S1B). Mz- and M28z-transduced T cells demonstrated similar MSLN-specific lysis in vitro (Fig. 1B and table S2). P28z CAR T cells did not lyse MSTO MSLN+, and mesothelin-targeted CARs did not lyse EL4 PSMA+. As expected for second-generation CARs (27), M28z CAR T cells secreted a two- to fivefold greater amount of T helper 1 (TH1)cytokines (fig. S1C) and afforded greater T cell accumulation upon repeated exposure to MSLN+ cells in the absence or presence of exogenous interleukin-2 (IL-2) (fig. S1, D and E). On the basis of these findings, we proceeded to evaluate the therapeutic potential of M28z in mice bearing established pleural tumors.

Fig. 1. Regional administration of MSLN CAR transduced T cells results in superior antitumor efficacy.

(A) MSLN-targeted constructs with CD3ζ endodomain alone (Mz) or with the CD28 costimulatory domain (M28z). A PSMA-directed CAR with CD28 costimulation (P28z) and PSMA+-expressing EL4 targets are included in experiments as negative controls. (B) Antigen-specific effector function of MSLN CAR–transduced T cells as shown by lysis of MSLN-expressing, but not PSMA-expressing, target cells measured by chromium-release assays. (C and E) Tumor BLI of nonobese diabetic mice (NOD)/severe combined immunodeficient (SCID)/γcnull mice bearing pleural tumor. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with either 1 × 105 (1x) or 3 × 106 (30x) M28z T cells intravenously (E/T 1:3000 or 1:100, respectively), compared with 1 × 105 (1x) or 3 × 105 (3x) M28z T cells intrapleurally (E/T 1:3000 or 1:1000, respectively). Death is depicted by an asterisk (*). (D and F) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates superior efficacy with intrapleural administration (solid blue line), compared with intravenous administration (dashed blue line). Median survival was not reached for intrapleural administration of M28z; median survival for intravenous administration was 27 days (1x) and 86 days (30x). Control mice treated with pleural P28z (black line) had a median survival of 27 to 42 days (n = 4 to 10 per group). Survival curves were analyzed with log-rank test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Raw data and exact P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

Regional delivery of M28z T cells is more potent than the systemic route

In an orthotopic model of MPM previously established by our laboratory (14, 23, 24, 28), serial bioluminescence imaging (BLI) using firefly luciferase (ffLuc)–transduced MSTO-211H was used to confirm establishment of tumor, equalize tumor burden across intervention groups before initiation of T cell therapy, and measure response to therapy. Mice with established pleural tumor were treated 12 days after tumor inoculation with either a single intravenous or a single intrapleural administration of 1 × 105 M28z CAR T cells [effector to target (E/T) ratio of 1:3000, estimated from tumor burden quantification as previously described] (23, 24). P28z CAR or untransduced T cells were administered at the same dose to demonstrate antigen specificity and control for alloreactivity and xenoreactivity. Treatment with intravenous M28z T cells at this dose resulted in marginal antitumor efficacy (Fig. 1C and table S2), hardly exceeding that of P28z control T cells (Fig. 1D, broken blue line versus solid black line, median survival of 27 versus 25 days, respectively). In contrast, intrapleurally administered M28z T cells induced major responses. Tumor burdens were significantly lower by day 7, becoming undetectable by day 11 (Fig. 1C). Median survival was not reached by day 100 (Fig. 1D). Treatment with a higher dose of intravenous M28z T cells (3 × 106, a 30-fold increase, E/T 1:100) reduced tumor burden but did not avert eventual tumor progression (Fig. 1E and fig. S2A), yielding a modest 44-day survival advantage (Fig. 1F, broken blue line). In contrast, a 10-fold lower dose of M28z CAR T cells (3 × 105, E/T 1:1000) administered intrapleurally rapidly decreased tumor burden within 10 days of administration (Fig. 1E and fig. S2A) and did not reach median survival by day 200 (Fig. 1F, solid blue line). Experimental results were similar with T cells from three different donors, arguing against a significant impact of alloreactivity, if any.

Unlike systemic delivery, intrapleural T cell administration promotes prompt M28z T cell expansion and differentiation

The long-term tumor-free survival observed with regional CAR T cell therapy, even at a dose 30-fold lower than that used intravenously, prompted us to investigate T cell tumor infiltration, expansion, and persistence after intrapleural versus intravenous administration. To this end, we first performed tumor and T cell noninvasive, quantitative BLI. All mice were treated with a single dose of T cells (1 × 106) coexpressing M28z and enhanced firefly luciferase (effLuc). Within 24 hours of administration, intrapleural delivery resulted in a rapid increase in pleural M28z T cell accumulation, 10-fold greater than that observed after intravenous delivery (Fig. 2A). This rapid and sustained accumulation occurred with M28z (Fig. 2B, blue line) but not with P28z T cells. Intravenously administered M28z T cells yielded signal comparable to intrapleurally delivered T cells after 5 to 7 days. Rising T cell BLI signal paralleled tumor burden regression recorded by concomitant tumor BLI decrease. Serial immunohistochemical analyses confirmed the T cell accumulation kinetics (fig. S2B). Further, flow cytometric analysis of the T cell to tumor cell ratio revealed a similar accumulation of CAR T cells at initial time points (days 3 to 5) when comparing the two routes of administration, which, however, diverged thereafter, steadily increasing in the case of intrapleurally delivered T cells but diminishing in the systemically treated mice (Fig. 2C and table S3). Consistent with differential acquisition of effector functions, we observed marked differences in the pleural CD4/CD8 ratio and the pattern of CD62L expression (L-selectin), a marker down-regulated upon T cell activation and effector memory formation (29). Whereas intrapleural administration maintained a balanced CD4/CD8 ratio, intravenous administration resulted in significantly lesser CD8+ accumulation (Fig. 2, C and D). The equal distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells seen within the spleen of these mice indicates that the reduced intratumoral CD8+ accumulation is not due to a systemic absence of CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, most intravenously administered CD4+ T cells demonstrated a nonactivated (CD62L+) T cell phenotype 1 week after administration. In contrast, a large proportion of intrapleurally administered CD4+ T cells exhibited an activated CD62L phenotype (Fig. 2F and table S3). CD8+ M28z T cells showed a similar reduction in CD62L expression in either case (Fig. 2F), establishing that differential activation primarily affected the activation of CD4+ T cells and the concomitant accumulation of CD8+ T cells.

Fig. 2. Intrapleurally administered M28z+ T cells display early, robust proliferation of both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets.

(A) Serial T cell BLI in tumor-bearing mice. Intravenously administered M28z+ T cells display delayed but equivalent accumulation in the progressing pleural tumor. (B) Average effLuc-luciferase signal intensities from sequential T cell BLI. Intrapleurally administered T cells (blue lines) display an earlier and sustained accumulation, with maximal T cell signal at day 5. Intravenously administered T cells show delayed accumulation, with maximal signal at day 7. (C) E/T ratios reflect M28z T cell accumulation in parallel with tumor burden at 6 hours and days 1, 3, and 7, confirming the findings of T cell BLI. Intravenous administration shows delayed T cell accumulation, lower E/T ratios, and decreased CD8+ T cell infiltration. (D) FACS analysis at day 7 displays an equal accumulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets within the tumor and spleen after intrapleural administration, compared with decreased tumor accumulation of CD8+ T cells and equal distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the spleen after intravenous administration. (E) A decrease in CD62L expression was observed in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after intrapleural administration. Error bars represent ±SEM. Raw data and P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

Regionally primed M28z T cells support potent, systemic, tumor-specific responses

To assess whether intrapleurally administered T cells provide systemic tumor protection, we treated mice bearing MSLN+ pleural tumors expressing firefly luciferase as well as MSLN+ and MSLN flank tumors (right flank, MSLN+; left flank, MSLN; Fig. 3A, left) with intrapleural M28z T cells expressing Gaussia luciferase. Fifteen days after T cell administration, BLI with coelenterazine demonstrated residual T cells in the pleural cavity and T cell accumulation in the MSLN+ right-flank tumor (Fig. 3A, center) but not the MSLN left-flank tumor. Tumor imaging with d-luciferin on the following day showed eradication of pleural tumor, regression of the MSLN+ right-flank tumor, and progression of the MSLN left-flank tumor (Fig. 3A, right). Furthermore, we investigated whether intrapleurally administered CAR T cells could traffic to the peritoneal cavity, a potential site of mesothelioma dissemination. In this dual pleural/peritoneal disease model, intrapleurally administered M28z T cells rapidly accumulated (days 1 to 2) and at a higher number than intravenously administered T cells (Fig. 3, B and C, and table S4).

Fig. 3. Intrapleurally administered M28z+ T cells display efficient systemic trafficking and accumulation in extrapleural tumor in an antigen-specific manner.

(A) Serial tumor and T cell BLI with dual luciferase imaging, demonstrating systemic trafficking and extrapleural tumor accumulation. Mice with established ffLuc+ MSLN+ tumor in the right flank and pleural cavity and MSLN tumor in the left flank received Gaussia luciferase+ M28z T cells intrapleurally. A representative mouse with tumor in the flanks and pleural cavity before T cell administration (left). T cell BLI 15 days after T cell administration demonstrates residual T cells in the pleural cavity and accumulation in the MSLN+ right-flank tumor (center). One day later, tumor BLI shows a reduced burden in the MSLN+ right-flank tumor, compared with the MSLN left-flank tumor (right). (B and C) Intrapleurally administered M28z+ T cells show early and robust accumulation in MSLN+ intraperitoneal tumor, compared with intravenously administered T cells. (C) Quantification of the fold increase in signal intensity of the peritoneal cavity in tumor-bearing mice displays enhanced T cell accumulation with intrapleural administration, compared with intravenous administration (n = 3 per group). Error bars represent ±SEM. Raw data and P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

Intrapleurally administered M28z T cells remain functional for at least 100 days

Having demonstrated rapid activation of regionally dispensed M28z T cells and their efficient extrathoracic redistribution, we further examined their persistence and function. After establishing large pleural tumor burdens over 18 days, we administered Mz, M28z, or P28z T cells into the pleural cavity at a low dose of 3 × 105 CAR+ T cells (E/T 1:1000). Treatment with M28z T cells induced a uniform reduction in tumor bioluminescence to background emission levels, as well as long-term tumor-free survival (median survival not reached versus 63 days in Mz versus 36 days in P28z, P = 0.01, Fig. 4). Serial assessment of CAR+ T cell counts in the peripheral blood of treated mice demonstrated increased T cell persistence in M28z-treated mice when compared to Mz-treated mice (50 days after T cell infusion; Fig. 4B and table S5). Similar results of T cell persistence were obtained using three separate T cell doses (3 × 106, 1 × 106, and 3 × 105 administered CAR+ T cells). Phenotype assessment of persisting T cells demonstrated progressive and predominant enrichment in CD4+ T cells 30 days after T cell infusion in both Mz- and M28z-treated mice (Fig. 4C and table S5). This gradual CD4+ enrichment was observed at all three T cell doses in both spleen and blood.

Fig. 4. Intrapleurally administered M28z T cells eradicate pleural tumor and establish long-term CD4+ predominant persistence.

(A) CD28 costimulation facilitates tumor eradication after a single dose of T cells. In total, 1 × 105 CAR+ Mz, M28z, or P28z (negative control) T cells were intrapleurally administered into mice bearing established tumors. Left: Tumor burden. Right: Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Median survival of the Mz and M28z groups (at least nine mice per group) was 63 days and median survival not reached, respectively. Survival curve was analyzed by log-rank test; **P < 0.01. (B) CD28 costimulation enhances CAR+ T cell persistence. Absolute CAR+ T cell counts (per milliliter of peripheral blood) at 50 days after intrapleural administration of 3 × 106 CAR+ T cells. Error bars represent ±SEM; *P < 0.05 by Student’s t test. (C) Persisting CAR+ T cells are predominantly CD4+. Left: FACS analysis of peripheral blood in treated mice. Right: CD4/CD8 ratios determined at successive time points after T cell administration. The preinfusion CD4/CD8 ratio was about 0.5. Results shown are similar across a range of T cell doses (3 × 106, 1 × 106, and 3 × 105 CAR+; n = 3 mice at each time point). *P < 0.05 by Student’s test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons comparing ratio at each time point to the preinfusion CD4/CD8 ratio. Raw data and P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

We next assessed the functional status of persisting T cells by performing a tumor rechallenge experiment. Mice with established MSLN+ pleural tumors were intrapleurally administered 3 × 105 Mz or M28z T cells to eradicate pleural tumor and promote long-term survival. Eighty-seven days after initial T cell injection, either MSLN+ or MSLN tumor cells (1 × 106) were administered into the peritoneal cavity to long-term survivors, and tumor burden was monitored using BLI. At the time of rechallenge, persisting T cells were predominantly effector memory (CD45RACD62L) cells (Fig. 5A) as evidenced by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis in representative mice. After an initial increase in tumor burden in all mice, antigen-specific control of tumor burden was seen in both Mz and M28z T cell–treated mice, more markedly in M28z-treated mice (Fig. 5B and table S6). We then sought to examine the T cell proliferative response on tumor challenge. Mice from all groups were sacrificed 16 days after rechallenge, and spleens were harvested for FACS analysis. Mice initially treated with M28z T cells and rechallenged with MSLN+ tumor showed a fourfold higher T cell expansion than those rechallenged with MSLN tumor (Fig. 5C). The greater T cell accumulation was predominantly attributable to the CD4+ subpopulation in the M28z group (Fig. 5D and table S6).

Fig. 5. Functional persistence of intrapleurally administered MSLN CAR T cells is predominantly mediated by CD4+ and is augmented by CD28 costimulation.

(A) FACS analysis of splenic single-cell suspension prepared from mice (n = 3) sacrificed 202 days after tumor eradication, after a single dose of 3 × 105 M28z T cells administered intrapleurally. CD3+GFP+ M28z T cells show a predominance of effector memory CD4+ T cells. (B) Tumor BLI of mice rechallenged with MSLN+ and MSLN tumor. Eighty-seven days after pleural tumor eradication, after administration of a single dose of 3 × 105 M28z or Mz T cells, 1 × 106 MSLN+ or MSLN tumor cells were injected into the peritoneal cavity. After tumor rechallenge, Mz T cells prevent tumor growth, whereas M28z T cells promote tumor regression. (C and D) Absolute M28z or Mz T cell numbers in the spleen after tumor rechallenge with either MSLN+ (n = 6) or MSLN (n = 6) tumor; mice were sacrificed 16 days after tumor rechallenge. Only the M28z T cell–treated mice rechallenged with MSLN+ tumor show a robust accumulation of CAR+ T cells in the spleen, the majority of which are CD4+ T cells. Error bars represent ±SEM; raw data and P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

Early-antigen activation of CD4+ M28z T cells is essential for enhancing CAR T cell efficacy

To assess the relative contribution of CD28 costimulation to CD4+ and CD8+ cytokine and proliferative responses, we stimulated CD4+, CD8+, and bulk T cells transduced with either Mz or M28z with MSLN+ tumor cells and quantified the secretion of TH1 cytokines and proliferation. Compared with CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells transduced with Mz had increased levels of TH1 cytokine secretion (Fig. 6A). CD28-costimulated CD4+ T cells secreted 11- to 50-fold higher levels of cytokines than did CD8+ T cells, showing that cytokine secretion is strongly enhanced in CD28-costimulated T cells, particularly in CD4+ T cells. As expected, repeated stimulation with MSLN+ targets did not induce T cell expansion in either the CD4+ or CD8+ Mz T cell population and rather rapidly induced a decline in T cell number upon antigen stimulation in the absence of exogenous IL-2 (Fig. 6B and table S7). In contrast, CD4+ M28z T cells showed a >20-fold greater mean proliferation by the third stimulation, compared with a 2-fold increase in CD8+ M28z T cells (P < 0.001). The importance of CD4+ CAR T cells in supporting M28z CAR T cell function was further demonstrated by the robust accumulation of CD8+ M28z T cells when cocultured with CD4+ M28z T cells and stimulated by MSLN+ targets (threefold greater accumulation; P < 0.001; Fig. 6C). To further confirm the potentiating function of CD4+ M28z CAR T cells in vivo, CD8+ M28z CAR T cells were transduced with effLuc (to monitor T cell accumulation in pleural tumor–bearing mice). CD8+ M28z CAR T cells had significantly enhanced in vivo accumulation when administered with CD4+ M28z T cells, as determined by tracking of T cell signal emission by BLI (2.3- versus 1.2-fold increase in T cell bioluminescence signal at 72 hours; Fig. 6, D and E, and table S7).

Fig. 6. CD4+ M28z T cells augment CD8+ accumulation that is enhanced with preactivation.

(A to C) Unsorted M28z and Mz or bead-sorted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were assayed. M28z CD4+ T cells show (A) higher cytokine secretion (from 4- to 14-fold; ***P < 0.001 by Student’s t test) and (B) profound T cell expansion without exogenous IL-2. (C) CD4+ M28z activation facilitates robust CD8+ M28z T cell accumulation upon repeated antigen stimulation in vitro. (D) Antigen-activated CD4+ M28z facilitates robust CD8+ M28z T cell accumulation in vivo. Isolated CD8+ effLuc M28z T cells were intrapleurally administered to MSLN+ pleural tumor–bearing mice with either CD4+ M28z (n = 6) or CD4+ control–transduced T cells (n = 6) and were serially imaged. One representative mouse (n = 6 per group; left) displays increased CD8+ M28z T cell accumulation in the presence of CD4+ M28z. (E) The average accumulation of CD8+ CAR+ T cells was calculated at the indicated intervals (P values as shown calculating fold increase from 16 to 72 hours; n = 6 per group). (F) Preactivation of M28z CD4+ enhances CD8+ proliferation, compared with simultaneous activation of CD4+. Bead-sorted CD8+ Mz or M28z T cells were cocultured with either corresponding Mz or M28z CD4+ or preactivated CD4+ T cells (activated on MSLN+ tumor cells 24 hours before the assay). Preactivation of M28z CD4+ enhances the accumulation of CD8+ to a greater degree than does CD8+ and CD4+ concurrent stimulation.

The enhanced antitumor efficacy of pleurally administered M28z T cells could be explained by an early-antigen activation of CD4+ M28z T cells, which may lead to optimal cytokine secretion to sustain the expansion of both the CD4+ and CD8+ CAR T cell subsets. To demonstrate the influence of early-antigen activation, we performed in vitro accumulation experiments described above using preactivated CD4+ M28z T cells (preactivated once on MSLN+ tumor cells 24 hours prior). CD4+ CAR T cell preactivation resulted in an enhancement of both CD4+ and CD8+ accumulation in vitro compared to the experimental condition where CD4+ T cells are antigen-exposed simultaneously with CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6F and table S7).

CD4+ CAR T cells demonstrate CD28-dependent granzyme/perforin-mediated cytotoxicity

We next investigated the cytotoxic potential of M28z CAR T cells. Purified CD8+ T cells demonstrated rapid cytotoxicity over 4 hours (Fig. 7A, left). CD4+ M28z+ T cells had lower rapid cytotoxic potential but reached equivalent levels to CD8+ M28z+ T cells by 18 hours. CD28 costimulatory signaling enhanced lysis by CD4+ M28z CAR T cells by 13 to 16% at multiple E/T ratios (P < 0.001; Fig. 7B) but did not consistently enhance CD8+ T cell–mediated cytolysis (P = 0.07). Transfer of cytokine-rich supernatant obtained from stimulated CD4+ M28z T cells added at the time of 51Cr-release assay enhanced the cytotoxicity of both CD4+ M28z T cells (5 to 23% enhancement; P < 0.0001; Fig. 7C) and CD8+ M28z CAR T cells (5 to 30% enhancement; P < 0.001; table S8). Transfer of supernatant alone or addition of supernatant to P28z control T cells did not result in lysis (Fig. 7C). We therefore conclude that the M28z CAR favors the formation of cytotoxic CD4+ T cell effectors and induces CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity in a CD4-dependent manner.

Fig. 7. CD4+ MSLN CAR+ T cells demonstrate efficient cytolytic function that is granzyme/perforin-dependent.

(A) CD4+ M28z T cells show a delayed but similar cytotoxicity as CD8+ M28z T cells. (B) CD28 costimulation enhances CD4+-mediated cytotoxicity. (C) Cytokine-rich supernatants obtained from stimulated CD4+ M28z CAR+ T cells enhance the cytotoxicity of both CD8M28z and CD4M28z T cells. (D) CAR T cell lytic function is dependent on the release of cytotoxic granules. Bulk, CD4, or CD8 M28z and Mz T cells were cocultured for 18 hours in the presence or absence of the chelating agent EGTA. (A to D) Cytotoxicity of bead-purified CD4+ or CD8+ Mz and M28z T cells. (E) Left: CD4+ CAR T cells express granzyme B, but with delayed kinetics, compared with CD8+ CAR T cells. Intracellular FACS analysis for granzyme B was performed on resting PBMCs, PHA-stimulated blasts, and M28z, Mz, and P28z T cells stimulated with MSLN+ for 4 or 18 hours. Right: CD28 costimulation enhances granzyme B expression. Histograms show expression at 18 hours after MSLN+ stimulation. Error bars represent ±SEM; *P < 0.05 by Student’s t test. Raw data and P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

With direct lysis of tumor targets by cytokine-rich supernatant excluded, we next sought to determine which of two cell contact–dependent lytic mechanisms (Fas receptor/Fas ligand or granzyme/perforin pathway) were responsible for CAR T cell cytotoxicity. Antibody blockade of Fas ligand/Fas receptor (FasL/FasR) interaction did not reduce target cell lysis by either Mz or M28z CAR T cells (P > 0.05; fig. S3A, left and middle). Flow cytometric analysis confirmed FasL expression by CAR T cells and FasR expression on MSLN+ tumor (fig. S3B). MSLN+ cells are indeed susceptible to FasL-mediated cytotoxicity, and the αFasL antibody used in these experiments blocked this effect (fig. S4A, right). Blockade of granzyme release by the addition of the calcium chelator EGTA to T cell/tumor cell coculture reduced CAR-mediated lysis in all groups tested (Fig. 7D and table S8), demonstrating that CAR T cell cytotoxicity is dependent on the perforin/granzyme pathway. The most prominent reduction in lysis was seen in the Mz (mean reduction, 27.6% versus 17.6% for M28z) and CD8+ (29.4% for CD8+ Mz versus 15.3% for CD4+ Mz; 24.2% for CD8+ M28z versus 11.1% for CD4+ M28z) T cell groups. Expression of granzymes A and B in resting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was primarily restricted to CD8+ T cells, in concordance with the results of previous studies (Fig. 7E and fig. S4C). Granzyme A expression is not significantly altered after phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulation and MSLN-specific stimulation of CAR-transduced T cells (fig. S4D). Granzyme B was expressed in >95% of CD4+ and CD8+ M28z CAR T cells within 18 hours after stimulation with MSLN-expressing tumor cells. CD8+ M28z T cells had a 1.8-fold increase in MFI after 4 hours of coculture, and granzyme B expression was further up-regulated to 2.6-fold during the final 12 hours. With CD4+ M28z T cells, however, granzyme B expression was up-regulated to a much greater degree during the final 12 hours of culture (1.5-fold during the first 4 hours to 3.7-fold during the final 12 hours). These findings may explain the delayed lysis kinetics displayed by CD4+ CAR T cells. Furthermore, M28z enhanced granzyme B expression in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets (Fig. 7E, expression after 18 hours of coculture), possibly explaining the enhanced cytotoxicity seen with CD4+ M28z T cells compared with CD4+ Mz T cells (Fig. 7B).

Regionally administered CD4+ CAR T cells are efficacious alone and mediate functional persistence

Our observations of a potent CD4+ M28z in vitro effector function and CD4+ predominant long-term immunity led us to hypothesize that CD4+ M28z T cells would demonstrate in vivo efficacy in the absence of CD8+ T cells. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with CD4+ M28z, CD8+ M28z, or bulk unsorted M28z T cells administered into the pleural cavity at three different doses after 18 days of tumor growth (Fig. 8, A and B, and table S9). In P28z-treated mice, the tumor burden steadily progressed until the mice had to be sacrificed (median survival, 28 days). Treatment with CD4+ M28z and bulk M28z CAR T cells (3 × 105, E/T 1:1000) resulted in tumor eradication in 100% of mice, with mice remaining tumor-free through 200 days of follow-up. Treatment with CD8+ M28z T cells extended survival by 83 days only (111 versus 28 days; P = 0.003; Fig. 8B) and achieved tumor eradication in only three of seven mice. Even at the lower doses, CD4+ M28z CAR T cells had higher efficacy than CD8+ CAR T cells [1 × 105: E/T 1:3000, 112 versus 67 days (P = 0.04); 3 × 104: E/T 1:10,000, 160 versus 37 days (P = 0.001); table S9]. These results illustrate that CD4+ CAR T cells alone are superior to CD8+ CAR T cells alone, although they are not as effective as combined CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Fig. 8. Intrapleurally administered CD4+ M28z CAR T cells are efficacious when administered alone in vivo, mediate enhanced efficacy compared with CD8+ M28z T cells, and establish long-term functional persistence.

(A) BLI tracking the progression of tumor burden. Eighteen days after tumor injection, mice received either 3 × 105 (3x), 1 × 105 (1x), or 3 × 104 (0.3x) CAR+ T cells of bulk M28z (n = 5), bead-sorted CD4+, CD8+ M28z (n = 7), or P28z (n = 4). (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves. At all doses, CD4+ M28z CAR+ T cells were efficacious compared with CD8+ CAR+ T cells. The antitumor efficacy of CD4+ CAR+ T cells was comparable to that of unsorted CAR+ T cells. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by Student’s t test. Raw data and P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials. (C) Tumor BLI of mice rechallenged with tumor. At 196 days after intrapleural administration of a single dose of 3 × 105 (3x) unsorted (bulk) M28z or bead-sorted CD4+ M28z T cells, 1 × 106 MSLN+ tumor cells were injected into the peritoneal cavity. Persisting CD4+ M28z T cells prevented tumor growth.

Finally, to address whether CD4+ T cells can establish long-term functional persistence when administered without CD8+ T cells, we performed peritoneal tumor rechallenge in mice 196 days after initial intrapleural administration of CD4+ sorted or bulk M28z T cells. Although there was an initial increase in tumor burden with persisting CD4+ M28z T cells compared to the bulk population containing both CD4+ and CD8+, tumors then regressed, and subsequent tumor growth was controlled for >4 weeks (Fig. 8C).


We took advantage of an orthotopic MPM model that faithfully mimics human disease (14, 23, 24, 28) to evaluate two routes of administration to treat malignant pleural disease with MSLN-targeted T cells. We found that intrapleurally administered CAR T cells vastly outperformed systemically infused T cells, inducing long-term complete remissions with less than 30-fold fewer M28z CAR T cells. Regionally administered CAR T cells displayed rapid and robust T cell expansion, resulting in effective T cell differentiation and systemic tumor immunity. This superior efficacy was dependent on early CD4+ T cell activation and associated with a higher intratumoral CD4/CD8 cell ratio and long-term memory. In contrast, intravenously delivered CAR T cells, even when accumulated at equivalent numbers in the pleural tumor, did not achieve comparable activation, tumor eradication, or persistence. The translational relevance of these findings is further increased by the use of human T cells and CARs because these will be used in clinical studies based on the results reported herein.

In our studies, we intrapleurally administered MSLN-targeted CAR T cells to mice bearing established pleural tumors (12 to 18 days after inoculation, control mice die by days 25 to 36). Using tumor and T cell noninvasive imaging, we demonstrated that intrapleurally administered CAR T cells (i) efficiently infiltrate throughout the tumor in the chest, (ii) become potent effector cells that eradicate pleural tumor at doses 30-fold lower than those used in intravenous therapy, and (iii) migrate out of the pleural cavity, circulate, and accumulate in extrathoracic tumor sites. Whereas the immediate location of regionally administered cells evidently circumvents the obligate circulation and transient pulmonary sequestration of intravenously administered T cells, the intrapleurally administered T cells differed from systemically recruited T cells in (i) the level of CD8 T cell accumulation and (ii) the rapidity of kinetics of effector differentiation, as reflected by CD62L down-regulation. The initial lack of pleural CD8+ T cell accumulation is not caused by overall CD8+ T cell disappearance, because CD8+ T cells persisted in the spleen of mice over 7 days after intravenous administration. Their poor recruitment could be in part due to suboptimal expression of chemokine receptor or adhesion molecules required for their trafficking. However, even though pleural accumulation may be enhanced by forced expression of transduced CCR-2 in CAR T cells (22), regional therapy with CAR T cells bypasses trafficking restrictions, if any, and enables, without additional T cell engineering, highly efficient redistribution to other tumor locations with greater efficacy than intravenously administered T cells. Furthermore, a single dose of regional CAR T cell therapy established long-term tumor immunity (up to 200 days after T cell administration), providing effective protection against tumor rechallenge.

This systemic benefit of regional CAR T cell therapy is reminiscent of the abscopal effect of locoregional radiation therapy (30, 31) and intratumoral oncolytic viral therapy (32) for solid malignancies, in which a local inflammatory response may generate specific immunity and affect distant tumor sites. Intrapleurally administered CAR T cells migrate out of the pleural cavity and are directly visualized at extrapleural tumor sites as early as 24 to 72 hours after administration. Thus, early T cell activation has a beneficial effect on CAR T cell biodistribution. The rapid acquisition of a CD62L phenotype may account for their efficient subsequent trafficking to metastatic sites (29). The extensive lymphovascularity of pleural mesothelioma (23) in our orthotopic model, which contrasts with that of flank tumors, which typically undergo central necrosis upon growth, may contribute to such efficient T cell activation and redistribution.

The ability of intrapleurally administered T cells to circulate and persist within the periphery opens new avenues of treatment for metastatic cancers with accessible tumor sites, which may serve as “regional charging and distribution centers” for CAR T cell therapy. These include cancers that metastasize to the pleural cavity, such as lung and breast cancers, as well as those that metastasize to the peritoneal cavity, such as pancreatic and ovarian cancers. In addition to intrapleural or intraperitoneal administration, our findings raise the prospect that other regional adoptive T cell therapy approaches such as hepatic artery infusion, regional limb perfusion, or intracranial administration (3335) may provide superior efficacy. More conservatively, these regional and/or intratumoral delivery approaches are highly applicable to other MSLN-expressing sold cancers, which include ovarian, pancreatic, colorectal, lung, triple-negative breast, esophageal, gastric, cholangio, and thymic cancer (1416, 3641). This approach may at the very least decrease the T cell dose requirement, presenting an advantage when high numbers of CAR T cells are not attainable (due to low-yield apheresis, poor ex vivo expansion, or low transduction) and may even obviate the need for systematic apheresis.

The early infiltration and activation of the CD4+ T cell subset is essential to the observed benefits of regional administration. M28z CAR T cells were multifunctional, displaying potent CD4+ T cell cytotoxicity as well as helper function in T cell effector formation, survival, and proliferation. The dual functionality of CD4+ T cells is most clearly demonstrated by the ability of CD4+ effectors to independently eliminate pleural mesothelioma xenografts after regional administration. Their key role in helper function is further supported by the enhanced CD8+ T cell subset observed after pleural administration compared to intravenous administration and the importance of early antigen–activated CD4+ T cells for achieving a CD8+ T cell proliferative burst. The lesser ability of intravenously administered T cells to achieve potent accumulation of both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets suggests that M28z CAR T cells are negatively affected by their delayed arrival at the tumor site.

The critical role of CD28 costimulation provided through the CAR is revealed in several ways. M28z T cells eliminated large pleural tumors even at low T cell doses. The intrapleural T cell dose we used (3 × 105 M28z T cells in most experiments) is a markedly lower dose than used in other mesothelioma xenografts studies (2022) and is comparable to doses used in current clinical trials for hematologic malignancies (9, 10) and solid tumors (42, 43) (table S1). Compared to Mz T cells, M28z T cells provided superior tumor control and robust proliferation upon tumor rechallenge >100 days after intrapleural administration. The potentiating properties of CD28 signaling are particularly notable in the CD4+ subset, as demonstrated by their superior cytokine secretion and proliferation, relative to CD8+ T cells. The CD28/CD3ζ CAR was essential to induce efficient CD4+ T cell–mediated cytotoxicity by a perforin/granzyme-dependent pathway. It is well established that CD4+ T cells require a higher-avidity interaction to mediate effector functions compared to CD8+ T cells (44, 45). CD28/CD3ζ CAR engineering may thus be particularly suited for generating multifunctional CD4+ T cells that are capable of T cell help and cytotoxicity (46).

The enhanced localization and activation of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells in the vicinity of normal tissues that express low levels of mesothelin may increase the hypothetical risk of “on-target off-tumor” toxicities such as pleuritis and pericarditis. However, mesothelin expression is markedly higher in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues, as we previously reported (1416). Because CAR T cell activation is stronger in the presence of higher antigen density, CAR T cells are expected to more strongly respond to tumor than to the normal tissue. This is supported by our in vitro studies using an isogenic target (fig. S5) and by other studies (46, 47). It is also noteworthy that histopathological studies in mice treated with mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells did not reveal inflammatory changes in the pleura or pericardium. Furthermore, clinical studies targeting mesothelin with immunotoxins have not shown toxicity to normal tissues in more than 100 patients (19, 48, 49). The reported toxicity observed in a patient treated with mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells (an anaphylactic shock) was due to an antibody response to the CAR, which comprises a murine scFv (50). Our M28z CAR is comprised of human sequences only (25). Nonetheless, we believe that additional strategies are necessary to limit or prevent reactivity against normal tissue. Because lymphotoxic corticosteroids can sometimes eliminate CAR T cells (11), we will proceed to the clinic using a suicide gene (51). Suicide genes such as iCaspase-9 (51), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutation (52), and herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (53) mediate rapid T cell elimination after administration of a prodrug or antibody. We may also pursue, if necessary, alternative strategies designed to prevent reactivity against normal tissues using combinatorial antigen recognition or inhibitory receptors (5456). Another strategy to limit CAR T cell toxicity is to transiently express the CAR using mRNA electroporation (21, 43), albeit at the expense of CAR T cell persistence and requiring multiple T cell administrations to attain efficacy.

In the reported study, we used immunodeficient mice with human cancer cells and human T cells to facilitate direct clinical translation of our findings and the human-based CAR vectors to clinical trials as we previously did for CD19- and PSMA-targeted CAR T cell therapies (11, 27, 57). The interactions between adoptively transferred cells and the endogenous immune system investigated in an immunocompetent mouse model will extend the significance of our observations.

On the basis of the data presented herein, we designed a phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the safety of intrapleural administration of MSLN-targeted CAR T cells. Patients with primary pleural malignancy or secondary pleural malignancies from lung and breast cancers overexpressing MSLN, which we have shown to have more aggressive disease (14, 15), will be enrolled on this trial. MSLN-targeted CAR T cells will be delivered through intrapleural catheters, an approach we developed to be the standard of care in managing patients with malignant pleural effusions (58). The regional administration of biological agents such as cytokines (59) and oncolytic virus (60) has been previously translated to the clinic with success. Our studies strongly support that regional CAR T cell administration to subjects with MPM will result in greater T cell antitumor potency with reduced T cell doses, owing in part to early CD4+ T cell activation and the systemic benefits that ensue.


Study design

The purpose of this study was to create an optimal T cell immunotherapy for solid malignancies. We designed mesothelin-targeted chimeric antigen receptors that, when transduced into human T cells, provide tumor antigen recognition and antigen-specific effector function. In vitro, we analyzed (i) cytotoxicity, (ii) cytokine secretion, and (iii) T cell proliferation. In vivo experiments analyzed strategies for optimizing T cell therapy using live imaging of both T cells and tumor. We used immunodeficient mice with human cancer cells and human T cells to validate and facilitate the translation of our M28z CAR to the clinic, as we previously did for CD19 (Brentjens, NM, 2003) and PSMA (Gade, CR, 2005). The study of mechanistic interactions between CAR T cells and the endogenous immune system would be best studied in an immunocompetent mouse model, which would, however, have to use a murine CAR differing from its clinically relevant counterpart. The experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Each experiment was performed multiple times using different donor T cells (T cells were never pooled). We present data using a representative experiment (with sample replicates of more than three) to avoid confounding variables such as differences due to transduction efficiencies, donor-related variability, and E/T ratios.

Cell lines

MSTO-211H (human pleural mesothelioma) and EL4 (murine thymoma) cells were retrovirally transduced to express the green fluorescent protein (GFP)/firefly luciferase fusion protein (MSTO GFP-ffLuc+). These cells were then transduced with the human MSLN variant 1 subcloned into a SFG retroviral vector to generate MSTO MSLN+ GFP-ffLuc+.

γ-Retroviral vector construction and viral production

To generate MSLN-specific CARs, we engineered a fusion protein encoding a fully human scFv, m912 [provided by D. Dimitrov, National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Frederick] (25), linked to the human CD8 leader peptide and the CD8/CD3ζ or CD28/CD3ζ sequences as previously described (26). Within the SFG γ-retroviral vector backbone (provided by I. Riviere, MSKCC), an internal ribosomal entry site was inserted to facilitate bicistronic expression of CARs with humanized recombinant GFP reporter gene. The Mz-, M28z-, and P28z-encoding plasmids were then transfected into 293T H29 packaging cell lines as previously described (61).

T cell isolation, gene transfer, and CD4/CD8 isolation

Peripheral blood leukocytes were isolated from the blood of healthy volunteer donors under an institutional review board–approved protocol. PHA-activated PBMCs were isolated by low-density centrifugation on Lymphoprep. Two days after isolation, PBMCs were transduced with 293T RD114–produced supernatant containing Mz, M28z, or P28z vectors for 1 hour on plates coated with retronectin (15 μg/ml) daily for 2 days. After allowing 3 days for vector expression, transduced PBMCs were maintained in IL-2 (20 U/ml). Transduction efficiencies were determined by flow cytometric analysis. Pure populations of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were obtained through negative selection protocols using Dynabeads Untouched Human CD4 and CD8 T cell isolation kits.

Cytotoxicity assays

The cytotoxicity of T cells transduced with a CAR or vector control was determined by standard 51Cr-release assays as previously described (62).

Orthotopic pleural mesothelioma animal model and in vivo assessments

To develop the orthotopic mouse model of pleural mesothelioma, female NOD/SCIDγ mice of ages 6 to 10 weeks were used. All procedures were performed under approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols. Mice were anesthetized using inhaled isoflurane and oxygen and were administered bupivacaine for analgesia. Direct intrapleural injection of 1 × 105 to 1 × 106 tumor cells in 200 μl of serum-free medium via a right thoracic incision was performed to establish orthotopic MPM tumors, as previously described (23, 24, 63, 64). In total, 3 × 104 to 3 × 106 transduced T cells were adoptively transferred into tumor-bearing mice, with 200 μl of serum-free medium, into the thoracic cavity of mice by direct intrapleural injection or systemically by tail vein injection. Peripheral blood was obtained by retro-orbital bleeding.

Cytokine detection assays

Cytokine release assays were performed by coculturing 5 × 105 to 5 × 103 T cells transduced with M28z, Mz, or control vector with 5 × 103 target cells in 200 μl of medium in 96-well round-bottomed plates as triplicates. After 6 to 24 hours of coculture, supernatants were collected. Cytokine levels were determined using a multiplex bead Human Cytokine Detection kit.

T cell proliferation assays

In total, 1 × 106 to 3 × 106 T cells transduced with M28z, Mz, or P28z were stimulated over irradiated MSTO-211H cells with or without MSLN expression and were plated in 6- or 24-well tissue culture plates at a density of 1 × 105 to 3 × 105 cells per well. Proliferation assays were performed in the absence or presence of exogenous IL-2 (20 U/ml), as indicated. Cells were counted every 4 or 7 days and then overlaid on irradiated MSTO-211H cells with or without MSLN expression. Cell number versus time was plotted for each T cell group, and phenotypes were determined by flow cytometric analysis.

Histologic analysis and immunostaining

Histopathologic evaluation of tumors was performed after hematoxylin and eosin staining of paraffin-embedded, 4% paraformaldehyde–fixed tissue samples. Immunohistochemical analysis for human MSLN was performed with a mouse anti–human MSLN immunoglobulin G (IgG). Human anti-CD3 staining was performed with a mouse anti-human CD3 IgG.

Flow cytometry

Human MSLN expression was detected using a phycoerythrin- or allophycocyanin-conjugated anti–human MSLN rat IgG2a. T cell phenotypes were determined with monoclonal antibodies for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD62L, CD25, CD27, and CD45RA. Subsequent flow cytometry for GFP, MSLN expression, and T cell phenotype analysis was performed on an LSRII cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo analysis software. Mouse tissues were processed as follows: Tissues were weighed and harvested into ice-cold RPMI 1640. The tissues were manually morselized with a scalpel and then mechanically disaggregated through 40- to 100-μm filters. Samples were resuspended, and 2 × 106 events were recorded on FACS.

Quantitative and T cell BLI in vivo

BLI in mice was performed using a single intraperitoneal dose of d-luciferin (150 mg/kg) for firefly or effLuc reporter gene (provided by P. Hwu, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center) (23, 65). Cells transduced with M28z and a Gaussia luciferase reporter gene were imaged with a single intravenous dose of 15 μg of native coelenterazine resuspended in 150 μl of propylene glycol/phosphate-buffered saline (1:1) (66). BLI data were analyzed using Living Image 2.60 software and BLI signal reported as total flux (photons per second). BLI flux (photons per second) was then determined as the average of ventral and dorsal images with Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp.) and analyzed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc.).

Statistical methods

Data are presented as means ± SD or SEM as stated in the figure legends. Results were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test (two-tailed) with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons where applicable. Survival curves were analyzed with log-rank test. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. All exact P values are provided in the Supplementary Materials. All statistical analyses were performed with Prism software version 6.0 (GraphPad).


Fig. S1. Mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells demonstrate antigen-specific effector function.

Fig. S2. Intrapleural administration of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells achieves durable tumor regression and a rapid accumulation of intratumoral T cells.

Fig. S3. Mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells lyse target cells via granzyme-perforin and CD4+ T cells are induced to up-regulate granzyme B.

Fig. S4. CAR T cell cytolytic function is proportional to level of target antigen expression.

Fig. S5. Gating strategy for flow cytometry.

Table S1. CAR T cell doses in preclinical and clinical studies.

Table S2. Raw data and statistical significance testing for Fig. 1.

Table S3. Raw data and statistical significance for Fig. 2.

Table S4. Raw data for Fig. 3.

Table S5. Raw data and statistical significance testing for Fig. 4.

Table S6. Raw data and statistical significance testing for Fig. 5.

Table S7. Raw data and statistical significance testing for Fig. 6.

Table S8. Raw data and statistical significance testing for Fig. 7.

Table S9. Raw data and statistical significance testing for Fig. 8.


  1. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to D. Dimitrov and Y. Feng (NCI) for providing us the mesothelin scFv under a material transfer agreement. The effLuc reporter gene was provided by P. Hwu (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX). We are thankful to C. Sima for all of the biostatistical analyses presented in this article. We also thank A. Torres of the MSK Thoracic Surgery Service for his editorial assistance. Funding: This work was supported, in part, by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Third Edward D. Churchill Research Scholarship; William H. Goodwin and Alice Goodwin, the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research and the Experimental Therapeutics Center; NCI (grants R21 CA164568-01A1, R21 CA164585-01A1, R01 CA136705-06, and 2T32CA9501-26A1); the U.S. Department of Defense (grants PR101053 and LC110202); NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748; the Lake Road Foundation; and Stand Up To Cancer—Cancer Research Institute Cancer Immunology Translational Cancer Research Grant (SU2C-AACR-DT1012). Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation administered by the American Association for Cancer Research. Author contributions: Conception and design: P.S.A., M.S.; development of methodology: P.S.A., M.S.; acquisition of data: P.S.A., L.C., J.V.-V., C.C., E.S., J.P.; analysis and interpretation of data: P.S.A., L.C., J.V.-V., C.C., E.S., D.R.J., M.S.; writing, review, and revision of the manuscript: P.S.A., L.C., J.V.-V., C.C., E.S., D.R.J., M.S.; administrative, technical, or material support: P.S.A., D.R.J., M.S.; study supervision: P.S.A., M.S. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science Translational Medicine

Navigate This Article