Research ArticleCancer

Anchoring of intratumorally administered cytokines to collagen safely potentiates systemic cancer immunotherapy

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Translational Medicine  26 Jun 2019:
Vol. 11, Issue 498, eaaw2614
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw2614

Keeping it local

Cancer immunotherapy has greatly advanced in recent years, with a variety of promising approaches. Unfortunately, many patients still do not respond to the available therapeutics. Cytokine-based treatments have been proposed in the past but have not caught on because of the severe adverse effects associated with systemic cytokine exposure. To address this problem, Momin et al. fused antitumor cytokines to the collagen-binding protein lumican. Intratumoral injection of the resulting fusion proteins in mouse models of cancer effectively potentiated the effects of other immunotherapies and stimulated systemic antitumor immunity without detectable toxicity.


The clinical application of cytokine therapies for cancer treatment remains limited due to severe adverse reactions and insufficient therapeutic effects. Although cytokine localization by intratumoral administration could address both issues, the rapid escape of soluble cytokines from the tumor invariably subverts this effort. We find that intratumoral administration of a cytokine fused to the collagen-binding protein lumican prolongs local retention and markedly reduces systemic exposure. Combining local administration of lumican-cytokine fusions with systemic immunotherapies (tumor-targeting antibody, checkpoint blockade, cancer vaccine, or T cell therapy) improves efficacy without exacerbating toxicity in syngeneic tumor models and the BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl genetically engineered melanoma model. Curative abscopal effects on noncytokine-injected tumors were also observed as a result of a protective and systemic CD8+ T cell response primed by local therapy. Cytokine collagen-anchoring constitutes a facile, tumor-agnostic strategy to safely potentiate otherwise marginally effective systemic immunotherapies.


Cytokines that amplify and coordinate immune cell responses for tumor control can robustly synergize with other immunotherapies (1). Two such cytokines are interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-12, which expand and stimulate T cells and natural killer (NK) cells to mediate antitumor immunity. Despite their promising therapeutic effects, dose-limiting toxicity curbs the efficacy and the clinical translation of these cytokine therapies. The adoption of high-dose IL-2 therapy, despite its U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, is limited by severe adverse effects. IL-12 therapies have not advanced to phase 3 clinical trials due to toxicity. Efforts to engineer these cytokines to safely capitalize on their therapeutic potential are underway.

Ultimately, a cytokine’s therapeutic index could be improved by localizing its effects to the tumor and away from healthy tissue. However, even when administered directly into a tumor, cytokines rapidly escape and enter systemic circulation in minutes, thus failing to fully address issues of toxicity and limited efficacy (2, 3). Recent efforts have shown that local injections of other immunomodulatory agents retained in or around a tumor lesion can improve efficacy and reduce systemic exposure (46).

To this end, we have developed a strategy to physically retain injected cytokine fusion proteins upon intratumoral injection, limiting their systemic dissemination while prolonging and localizing their therapeutic antitumor activity. We hypothesized that collagen, which is abundantly and ubiquitously expressed in tumors (7, 8), would be an effective and generalizable target for intratumoral localization. To devise collagen-anchoring cytokines, we fused IL-2 and IL-12 to lumican, a collagen-binding protein. Intratumorally administered collagen-anchoring IL-2 and IL-12 demonstrated prolonged intratumoral retention and effectively eliminated systemic exposure toxicity compared to locally injected nonanchoring versions. Tumor-localized, lumican-cytokine fusions amplified systemic cellular antitumor immunity when combined with several marginally efficacious systemic immunotherapies: a tumor-targeting antibody, vaccine, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, and neoadjuvant preoperative programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint blockade in several syngeneic tumor models and the BrafV600E/Pten−/− genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of melanoma. These results demonstrate that locally administered collagen-anchoring cytokines safely potentiate systemic immunotherapies.


Lumican fusions bind collagen types I and IV and are intratumorally retained but systemically isolated

In search of an anchor for our localization strategy, we evaluated several collagen-binding proteins (Fig. 1A) (913). Issues with protein expression (fig. S1) and immunogenicity concerns narrowed the shortlist to lumican, an endogenous proteoglycan that assists in collagen fibril assembly (12). Lumican is a stable protein (14) (fig. S2, A and B) that binds specifically to collagen types I and IV (Fig. 1B). Collagens I and IV are components of the thick fibrotic capsule surrounding tumors and the perivascular basement membrane, respectively (fig. S3). Intratumorally injected fluorescently labeled lumican colocalized with both collagen types in B16F10 tumors (Fig. 1, C and D). Although its expression and distribution vary, collagen is present in many syngeneic tumor models (7) and is thereby a tumor-agnostic target.

Fig. 1 Lumican binds collagen and demonstrates prolonged retention and systemic isolation after intratumoral injection.

(A) Schematic of a sample fusion protein used to anchor cytokines to intratumoral collagen when locally injected. Black lines represent glycine-serine linkers between collagen-binding protein lumican (red), mouse serum albumin (MSA, blue), and the cytokine. (B) Lumican binding to collagen types I and IV was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (n = 4, mean ± SD). MSA serves as a nonspecific protein control. (C and D) Representative immunofluorescence images of B16F10 tumors excised, fixed, and frozen 4 days after intratumoral injection of fluorescently labeled lumican (middle, purple). Sections were stained for either (C) collagen type I (left, green) or (D) collagen type IV (left, green). White pixels in the merged composites (right) represent areas of colocalization between lumican and the respective collagen stain. Scale bars, 500 μm. (E) Images and (F) quantification of intratumoral retention and (G) serum fluorescence as a percentage of the injected dose (ID) of labeled Lumican-MSA and MSA after injection into B16F10-TRP2KO tumors (n = 5, mean + SD). i.tu., intratumoral.

Having confirmed lumican’s ability to bind collagen, we next assessed whether fusion to lumican improves the intratumoral retention of a payload. Ultimately, several factors dictate the intratumoral retention of a lumican-cytokine fusion protein: collagen-binding affinity, collagen concentration, size-dependent escape by diffusion or convection, and cytokine receptor–mediated consumption. Although lumican’s affinity for collagen [dissociation constant (Kd) > 100 nM] is relatively weak (Fig. 1B), high collagen abundance can drive complexation. To evaluate the retention imparted by collagen anchoring, we fused lumican to mouse serum albumin (MSA). We monitored the persistence of fluorescently labeled Lumican-MSA to MSA after intratumoral injection into apigmented B16F10 tumors using in vivo fluorescence imaging (Fig. 1, E and F). By 24 hours after injection, nearly all MSA had disappeared, whereas Lumican-MSA was still retained (Fig. 1, E and F). The fitted half-life in fluorescence of Lumican-MSA (t1/2 = 24 hours) was slower than for MSA (t1/2 = 5.2 hours). Lumican alone (37 kDa, t1/2 = 16 hours) exits the tumor faster than Lumican-MSA (104 kDa), presumably due to its smaller size, but still is retained better than MSA (67 kDa) (fig. S4). These results collectively demonstrate that collagen-binding affinity and molecular weight both contribute to prolonged intratumoral persistence of a fused payload.

To evaluate the extent to which the lumican-collagen interaction inhibits systemic dissemination of a fused payload, we compared the serum fluorescence of mice intratumorally injected with fluorescently labeled Lumican-MSA to MSA (Fig. 1E). Twelve hours after intratumoral injection, 25% of the injected dose of MSA and 3% of the injected dose of Lumican-MSA were detected in the serum (Fig. 1G). On the basis of the area under the curve (Fig. 1G), fusion to lumican reduced MSA’s systemic exposure by 10-fold.

Collagen-anchored IL-2 potentiates efficacy of a tumor-targeting antibody

IL-2 is a compelling candidate for tumor localization because its antitumor efficacy requires sustaining a high intratumoral concentration (15). Extended systemic IL-2 exposure potentiates the efficacy of antitumor antibodies (16, 17), adoptive T cell transfer (16), and combination immunotherapies with checkpoint blockade and antitumor vaccines (18). We explored the therapeutic effect of prolonging IL-2’s intratumoral retention by collagen anchoring.

IL-2 was expressed as a fusion to the C terminus of Lumican-MSA, Lumican-MSA-IL2 (fig. S5A) and confirmed to bind intratumoral collagen in vivo (fig. S5B). MSA was incorporated to ensure steric access of receptors to IL-2 when bound to collagen fibrils and also to increase the construct’s molecular weight and thereby reduce diffusive flux away from the tumor. As an equivalently bioactive comparator (fig. S6), IL-2 was also expressed as a fusion to MSA (MSA-IL2) (fig. S5A), allowing the effects of collagen binding to be largely separated from size-based improvements in tumor retention of small cytokines like wild-type IL-2 (16, 19, 20). We treated mice bearing established subcutaneous flank B16F10 melanoma tumors with an antibody against tyrosinase-related protein 1 (anti–TYRP-1 or TA99) intraperitoneally and/or with an intratumoral injection of an IL-2 fusion protein. Treatment with either Lumican-MSA-IL2 or MSA-IL2 provided modest tumor growth delay (fig. S7A), and Lumican and TA99 provided no benefit (Fig. 2A and fig. S7, A and B). In contrast, simultaneous administration of TA99 and IL-2 showed significant efficacy (P < 0.0001), with the majority (15 of 17) of Lumican-MSA-IL2–injected mice cured, but very few (4 of 17) of those injected with MSA-IL2 cured (Fig. 2A). After cessation of treatment, nearly all (16 of 17) mice injected with Lumican-MSA-IL2 developed vitiligo localized at the site of tumor inoculation, whereas only 1 of 17 MSA-IL2–treated mice displayed vitiligo (Fig. 2, B and C). Vitiligo coincides with the observation of an anti-melanocyte T cell response (21).

Fig. 2 Anchoring IL-2 to collagen potentiates tumor-targeting antibody TA99.

Mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 B16F10 cells on day 0. (A) Survival of these mice treated with intratumoral injections of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; n = 7), MSA-IL2 (n = 17), Lumican (n = 7), or Lumican-MSA-IL2 (n = 17) and intraperitoneal (i.p.) TA99 on days 6, 12, and 18. (B) Representative image and (C) percentage of treated mice with localized vitiligo after indicated treatment. (D) Survival of B16F10 tumor–bearing mice treated intraperitoneally with TA99 and Lumican-MSA-IL2 injected intratumorally (n = 17), peritumorally (peri.tu.) (n = 5), or 2 cm distal to the lesion subcutaneously at the tail base (s.c. tail base) (n = 5). (E) Survival of B16F10 tumor–bearing Batf3−/− or wild-type (WT) mice treated intraperitoneally with TA99 and treated intratumorally with Lumican-MSA-IL2 and with indicated depletion antibody (n = 5 per group). (F) Representative images (top) of an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay and quantification (bottom) of B16F10-reactive spot-forming units (SFU) from splenocytes isolated 4 days after the indicated treatments (n = 3 per group, mean ± SD). ELISPOT data analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (G) Study of mice inoculated with 1 × 106 B16F10 cells on the right flank [ipsilateral (ipsi)] and with 3 × 105 B16F10 cells on the left flank (contralateral) on day 0. Ipsilateral intratumoral treatments were administered alongside TA99 intraperitoneally on days 6 and 12. Tumor area (left, mean + SD) of the contralateral (untreated) and ipsilateral (treated) lesions and survival (right) were monitored (n = 7 per group). Tumor area for each group is shown until a mouse in the group reaches the euthanasia criterion. Arrowheads indicate times of treatment. Survival was compared by log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.03, **P < 0.002, ***P < 0.0002, ****P < 0.0001. ns, not significant.

We evaluated the efficacy of TA99 treatment plus Lumican-MSA-IL2 injected into other anatomical sites: peritumorally (adjacent to the lesion) (Fig. 2D), intranodally (into the tumor-draining inguinal lymph node) (fig. S8), or subcutaneously at the tail base, 2 cm distal to the tumor site (Fig. 2D). Lumican-MSA-IL2 required intratumoral localization for maximal efficacy.

Lumican-MSA-IL2 and TA99 prime a curative tumor–specific T cell response

Given IL-2’s broad effects, we sought to determine the contributions of distinct immune cells and soluble factors to Lumican-MSA-IL2’s therapeutic efficacy by antibody-mediated depletions or in Batf3−/− mice that are deficient in cross-presenting dendritic cells (DCs). Depletion of NK cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, or macrophages did not alter efficacy (Fig. 2E and fig. S9), indicating that no single tested innate cell population was independently responsible for tumor control. However, CD8+ T cells, cross-presenting DCs, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) were critical for tumor rejection (Fig. 2E).

Because earlier studies indicated that systemic adaptive immune activation is required for effective therapy (22), the localized patch of vitiligo raised the question of whether a tumor-specific T cell response could be detected outside the treated lesion. An IFN-γ ELISPOT (enzyme-linked immunospot) on splenocytes harvested 4 days after treatment with TA99 and IL-2 revealed tumor-specific T cells in the spleen. Treatment with Lumican-MSA-IL2 yielded nearly fourfold more tumor-specific T cells in the spleen than diffusible MSA-IL2 (Fig. 2F). We used intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-γ on splenocytes to confirm that this response was generated by tumor-specific CD8+ T cells (fig. S10, A and B). These results show that Lumican-MSA-IL2, although tumor localized, mobilizes a greater systemic tumor-specific response than its unanchored equivalent, MSA-IL2. The majority (9 of 15) of long-term survivors of TA99 and Lumican-MSA-IL2 treatment rejected a rechallenge with B16F10 inoculated on the contralateral flank, indicative of the formation of effective systemic immunological memory with this therapy (fig. S10C).

Next, we probed for the capacity of the peripheral effectors induced by the combination of TA99 and localized IL-2 treatment to control a concurrent distant lesion (23). We inoculated B16F10 tumors subcutaneously on both flanks and administered TA99 systemically but IL-2 intratumorally only into the right, or ipsilateral, tumor. The combination with MSA-IL2, which can leak out of the ipsilateral tumor and to the contralateral lesion after injection, imparted some contralateral tumor control, but most mice succumbed to tumor burden (Fig. 2G). Conversely, the combination with Lumican-MSA-IL2, which is isolated to the ipsilateral tumor, halted ipsilateral and contralateral tumor growth, resulting in durable cures in most (four of seven) mice (Fig. 2G). The antitumor response elicited by anchoring IL-2 in a single tumor is superior in controlling and eradicating disseminated disease than systemic exposure of the same IL-2 dose.

IL12-MSA-Lumican eliminates treatment-related weight loss

Next, we applied this localization platform to another toxicity-limited cytokine, IL-12. IL-12 acts as a key regulator in T helper cell 1–mediated immunity, which is critical for effective antitumor responses. Unfortunately, severe toxicities and fatalities halted an early clinical trial administering systemic IL-12 (24). IFN-γ, induced by IL-12 stimulation of NK and T cells, was not only implicated in the toxicity but is also inextricably coupled to IL-12’s efficacy (25). We hypothesized that localizing IL-12 to the tumor would ameliorate this toxicity.

We constructed wild-type murine IL-12 p40 and p35 subunits in a single-chain format (scIL12). To create a collagen-anchoring version of IL-12, we expressed scIL12 at the N terminus of MSA-Lumican fusion, henceforth IL12-MSA-Lumican (fig. S11, A and B). For comparison, we used IL12-MSA, a nonanchoring version of scIL12 (fig. S11, A and B).

Intratumoral administration of IL12-MSA in B16F10 tumor–bearing mice led to significant (P < 0.002) weight loss, a proxy for toxicity (Fig. 3A). Systemic administration of IL12-MSA via intraperitoneal injection resulted in identical weight loss (Fig. 3A). In contrast, an equimolar intratumoral injection of IL12-MSA-Lumican did not cause weight loss (Fig. 3A). These results demonstrate that local administration without an effort toward retention is insufficient to alleviate toxicity, and collagen anchoring provides sufficient intratumoral confinement to curb systemic toxicities of IL-12.

Fig. 3 Collagen-anchoring IL-12 demonstrates reduced toxicity and potentiates disparate systemic immunotherapy modalities.

Mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 B16F10 cells on day 0. (A) Weight change from baseline and (B) corresponding survival of these mice after treatment with intratumoral injection of PBS (n = 6), IL12-MSA (n = 7), or IL12-MSA-Lumican (n = 7) or intraperitoneal injection of IL12-MSA (n = 7) on days 6 and 12. Weight change for the entire group plotted until a mouse in that group reaches the euthanasia criterion. (C) Mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 B16F10 cells on day 0. Vaccinations (Vacc) were administered subcutaneously (s.c.) at the tail base. The graphs show weight change from baseline (left, mean + SD), corresponding tumor area (middle, mean + SD), and survival (right) of mice treated with intratumoral injections of PBS (n = 12), IL-12 (n = 10 for IL12-MSA; n = 10 for IL12-MSA-Lumican), vaccine (n = 7) alone, or vaccine and IL12 (n = 7 for IL12-MSA; n = 7 for IL12-MSA-Lumican) on days 5, 11, and 17. (D) Mice were inoculated with 0.5 × 106 B16F10 cells on day 0 and lymphodepleted by total body irradiation on day 4. CAR-T treatments using 10 million CD3+ CAR-T cells were injected intravenously (i.v.) through the tail vein only on day 5. The graphs show weight change from baseline (left, mean + SD), corresponding tumor area (middle, mean + SD), and survival (right) of mice treated with intratumoral injections of PBS (n = 11), IL-12 (n = 9 for IL12-MSA; n = 5 for IL12-MSA-Lumican), CAR-T (n = 11) alone, or CAR-T and IL12 (n = 9 for IL12-MSA; n = 5 for IL12-MSA-Lumican) on days 5 and 11. (E) Mice were inoculated with 0.5 × 106 4T1-Luc cells in the mammary fat pad on day 0. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered on days 7 and 13, and the primary tumors were surgically excised on day 16. After the operation, mice were monitored for metastases by in vivo imaging. The graphs show total body weight change during neoadjuvant treatment (left, mean + SD), primary tumor growth and weight (middle, mean + SD), and metastasis-free survival (right) of mice left untreated (n = 10) or treated with intratumoral injections of IL-12 (n = 10 for scIL12; n = 9 for IL12-MSA-Lumican) and intraperitoneal injection of anti–PD-1 on days 7 and 13. Arrowheads indicate times of treatment. Tumor area for each group shown until a mouse in that group reaches the euthanasia criterion or primary tumor is excised. Weight change shown until a mouse in study reaches the euthanasia criterion or primary tumor is excised. Weight changes and excised tumor weights were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Survival was compared by log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.03, **P < 0.002, ***P < 0.0002, ****P < 0.0001.

IL12-MSA-Lumican safely potentiates a cancer vaccine, CAR-T cell therapy, and neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade

Monotherapy with IL-12 delayed tumor outgrowth but was not curative (Fig. 3B). Several synergistic combinations to potentiate the antitumor effects of IL-12 have been proposed but suffer from prohibitive supra-additive toxicities (26). To enable its safe use in combination strategies, groups have devised DNA-based (27), cell-based (28), or material-based (29) methods intended to locally confine IL-12 activity. In these forms, IL-12 has enhanced the efficacy of cancer vaccines, CAR-T cell therapy, and neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade. We sought to evaluate our recombinant protein–based approach to IL-12 localization in combination with these same immunotherapies. Anticipating toxicities arising in combination treatments, we reduced the IL-12 dose to a tenth of that administered in Fig. 3 (A and B) and fig. S12.

Intratumoral electroporation of IL-12–encoding DNA is being investigated clinically as a vaccine adjuvant in melanoma (27). We speculated that tumor collagen–localized IL-12 could analogously potentiate T cells primed by an effective antitumor vaccine. Subcutaneous administration of cyclic dinucleotide adjuvant and a lymph node–targeting moiety (30) fused to B16F10-associated peptide antigens TYRP-1 and EGP primed an antigen-specific CD8+ T cell response (fig. S13). The vaccination alone modestly delayed B16F10 tumor growth; however, coadministration with IL-12, using either IL12-MSA or IL12-MSA-Lumican, prolonged tumor control, with IL12-MSA-Lumican extending survival longer than IL12-MSA (Fig. 3C). In addition, vaccination with IL12-MSA caused weight loss that was not observed with IL12-MSA-Lumican.

IL-12 also amplifies CAR-T cell efficacy, as observed with autocrine IL-12–expressing “armored” CAR-T cell (28). However, the lack of stringent spatiotemporal expression of IL-12 in such cell therapies can lead to marked toxicity, as seen in two terminated clinical trials (NCT01236573 and NCT01457131) using IL-12–engineered T cells, a concern potentially averted by intratumoral administration of collagen-anchoring cytokines. B16F10-specific CAR-T cells were generated by transducing CD3+ splenocytes to express a CAR composed of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) of TA99 fused to costimulatory CD28 and CD3ζ signaling domains. To ensure CAR-T cell engraftment, all mice were preconditioned with total body irradiation the day before a single bolus injection of 10 million CAR-T cells. Treatment with CAR-T cells or IL-12 alone only delayed tumor growth. However, the combination of CAR-T cells and IL-12, as either IL12-MSA or IL12-MSA-Lumican, demonstrated increased survival. However, only CAR-T cell therapy combined with IL12-MSA-Lumican produced durable tumor regression (Fig. 3D) and prominent vitiligo in every mouse treated. In addition, IL12-MSA caused weight loss that was not observed with IL12-MSA-Lumican (Fig. 3D).

Intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using anti–PD-1 checkpoint blockade (31) and biomaterial-embedded IL-12 has demonstrated efficacy in controlling recurrence and metastases (29). We hypothesized that collagen-anchored IL-12 could recapitulate these effects in the spontaneously metastasizing tumor model 4T1. Luciferase-expressing 4T1 breast tumor cells (4T1-Luc) were implanted into the mammary fat pad. Before surgical resection of this lesion, mice were treated with IL-12 intratumorally and anti–PD-1 systemically. The neoadjuvant therapy with IL12-MSA-Lumican resulted in more primary tumor debulking than the nonanchoring version scIL12. After primary tumor resection surgery, mice were monitored for metastases by in vivo bioluminescence imaging. IL12-MSA-Lumican completely protected mice from metastatic growth, whereas several mice treated with scIL12 relapsed (Fig. 3E). These results demonstrate that collagen-anchoring IL-12 in a neoadjuvant setting can improve postoperative metastasis outcomes.

IL12-MSA-Lumican plus Lumican-MSA-IL2 cures B16F10 tumors without systemic toxicity

Collagen-anchoring IL-2 or IL-12 safely potentiated the effects of a tumor-targeting antibody (Fig. 2A), cancer vaccine (Fig. 3C), CAR-T cell therapy (Fig. 3D), and neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade (Fig. 3E). The first three of these therapies require a priori knowledge of expressed tumor antigens to inform their development. Having devised a generalizable approach for cytokine localization, we next explored combinations using exclusively tumor-agnostic agents.

IL-2 and IL-12 engage complementary signaling pathways in NK and T cells (32, 33). Furthermore, IL-2 up-regulates the expression of IL-12 receptor subunit β (34), and IL-12 sustains surface expression of IL-2 receptor CD25 (35). This reciprocity augments the effects of IL-2 and IL-12. Despite promising efficacy, several clinical trials of this combination have been terminated (32, 36). This combination also greatly enhances lymphocyte production of IFN-γ (32). Therefore, in addition to mutual potentiation, we anticipated that, unless collagen anchored, these cytokines would cause substantial systemic toxicity (37).

As single agents dosed intratumorally, the reduced dose of IL12-MSA and MSA-IL2 neither cause weight loss (fig. S14) nor overall survival enhancement (Fig. 3, C to E, and fig. S7) in B16F10 tumor–bearing mice. However, as anticipated, the combination of unanchored IL12-MSA and MSA-IL2 resulted in significant (P < 0.0001) weight drop and modest overall survival (Fig. 4A). In comparison, the collagen-anchoring versions, IL12-MSA-Lumican and Lumican-MSA-IL2, did not cause weight loss and resulted in the survival of three of five mice (Fig. 4A). Collagen-anchoring IL-2 and IL-12 curbed the treatment-related toxicity and, moreover, tapped into the curative potential of this cytokine combination (Fig. 4A) at doses where the monotherapies were ineffective (Fig. 3, C to E, and fig. S7).

Fig. 4 Collagen-anchored IL-12 and IL-2 safely potentiate anti–PD-1.

Mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 B16F10 cells on day 0. (A) Weight change from baseline (left, mean + SD) and corresponding survival (right) of B16F10 tumor–bearing mice treated with intratumoral injections of PBS (n = 5), MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA (n = 5), or Lumican-MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA-Lumican (n = 5) on days 5 and 11. Weight change shown until a mouse in study reaches the euthanasia criterion. (B) Quantification (top, mean ± SD) of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (gated on single cell/live/CD45+/CD3+) on day 11 and their corresponding median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of surface PD-1 (bottom, mean ± SD) after the indicated treatments on day 5. (C) Weight change from baseline (left, mean + SD) and corresponding survival (right) of B16F10 tumor–bearing mice treated with intratumoral injections of PBS (n = 5), MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA (n = 5), or Lumican-MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA-Lumican (n = 5) alongside intraperitoneal anti–PD-1 on days 5 and 11. (D) Percentage of treated mice with localized vitiligo after the indicated treatments. Treatment groups for which vitiligo was not observed are not included in this plot. (E) Percentage of long-term survivors, treated as indicated, which rejected a rechallenge on day 100 with 105 B16F10 cells inoculated on the contralateral flank. (F and G) Tumor area (left, mean + SD) and survival (right) of mice inoculated with (F) 1 × 106 EMT6 cells (n = 7 to 14 per group) or (G) 1 × 106 MC38 cells (n = 6 to 8 per group) on day 0 and treated as indicated on days 5, 11, and 17. Arrowheads indicate times of treatment. Weights and T cell data were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Survival was compared by log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.03, **P < 0.002, ***P < 0.0002, ****P < 0.0001.

We examined which immune cells were responsible for the efficacy of intratumoral IL12-MSA-Lumican and Lumican-MSA-IL2 combination. On the basis of antibody-mediated depletions during the course of treatment in B16F10 tumor–bearing wild-type and Batf3−/− mice, we found CD8+ T cells and cross-presenting DCs to be indispensable for efficacy (fig. S15A). Individual depletion of NK cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, or macrophages did not affect the survival outcome (fig. S15B). Unexpectedly, blocking IFN-γ, known to be amplified by concurrent IL-2 and IL-12 stimulation, also did not significantly alter survival (fig. S15A). This lack of effect might be attributed to insufficient depletion of excessive IFN-γ produced. Completely neutralizing IFN-γ is challenging due to the short distance between a nascently secreted IFN-γ and its receptor, which is expressed on all cells. Within the cohort given the IFN-γ depletion antibody, we observed a bimodal effect on early tumor growth, suggesting some therapeutic role of this cytokine (fig. S15C). In comparing immune cell infiltrates between IL12-MSA– and MSA-IL2–treated tumors versus IL12-MSA-Lumican– and Lumican-MSA-IL2–treated tumors, the difference in CD8+ T cells was most notable (fig. S16, A to D). Tumors treated with the lumican-cytokine fusions had more infiltrating CD8+ T cells compared to tumors treated with the unanchored cytokines 6 days after the initial treatment (Fig. 4B). However, these effectors had higher surface expression of PD-1, a T cell exhaustion marker (Fig. 4B).

Tumor-agnostic IL-12 and IL-2 combination enhances PD-1 checkpoint blockade

Given the up-regulation of surface PD-1 on tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in response to lumican-cytokine treatment, we tested whether this local cytokine therapy could synergize with systemic PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Because we also observed tumor-specific T cells in the periphery 6 days after the first treatment with IL-2 and IL-12 (fig. S16E), we chose to administer anti–PD-1 systemically to alleviate intratumoral and peripheral immunosuppression. The inclusion of anti–PD-1 did not alter the weight loss patterns observed previously for this treatment (Fig. 4, A and C), but the addition of anti–PD-1 improved survival outcomes for mice treated with IL12-MSA and MSA-IL2. Although anti–PD-1 administration did not further improve survival for IL12-MSA-Lumican– and Lumican-MSA-IL2–treated mice, localized vitiligo occurred more frequently when anti–PD-1 was given alongside lumican-cytokines (Fig 4D). In addition, more survivors from cytokine and anti–PD-1 treatment (six of six mice) compared to survivors from cytokine treatment alone (one of three mice) were protected against a subsequent tumor rechallenge with B16F10 (Fig. 4E). Inclusion of anti–PD-1 in this therapy increased the occurrence of treatment-induced vitiligo (Fig. 4D) and effective memory (Fig. 4E), thus demonstrating its role in enhancing T cell responses generated from localized IL-2 and IL-12 treatment. Despite the potency, treatment did not generate endogenous antibodies against the administered fusion proteins, indicating that these agents are immune activating but not themselves antigenic (fig. S17).

Previous findings regarding the specific mechanism of action for IL-12–mediated tumor control varied depending on the tumor type and/or location (38, 39). We speculated whether this cytokine combination would be effective in other syngeneic tumor models. Because collagen is expressed ubiquitously across all solid tumors, IL12-MSA-Lumican and Lumican-MSA-IL2 could be tumor antigen–agnostic immunotherapies. In general, tumors can be prognostically classified into phenotypes including “immune desert,” “immune excluded,” or “inflamed” based on their T cell infiltration (1). B16F10 melanoma (Fig. 4, A to E) is poorly immunogenic and therefore demonstrates an immune desert phenotype (40). The metastatic 4T1 breast model treated with IL-12, anti–PD-1, and surgery in Fig. 3E is strongly immunogenic and immune cell infiltrated and thereby recapitulates an inflamed phenotype (40). To evaluate the generalizability of lumican-cytokines and PD-1 checkpoint blockade to immune excluded tumors, we used the EMT6 mammary carcinoma and the MC38 colon carcinoma models (41). Treatment of either EMT6 (Fig. 4F) or MC38 (Fig. 4G) lesions with IL12-MSA-Lumican and Lumican-MSA-IL2 and systemic anti–PD-1 achieved survival improvements.

IL12-MSA-Lumican, Lumican-MSA-IL2, anti–PD-1, and TA99 demonstrate efficacy in BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl GEMM

Because syngeneic tumors poorly recapitulate the progression and pathophysiology of human cancers, we tested the effectiveness of lumican-cytokines in the BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl GEMM. Melanomas in this GEMM are induced by tamoxifen-regulated Cre expression in melanocytes, which drives the activation of oncogenic BrafV600E and biallelic deletion of tumor suppressor Pten. This model has modest T cell infiltration, but growth is only slightly slowed by dual checkpoint blockade of PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) (42). We thought treatment with IL-2 and IL-12 alongside anti–PD-1 checkpoint blockade could reinvigorate the ongoing response and prime new T cell responses, as we observed in B16F10 tumors (Fig. 4). However, considering that BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl melanomas have fewer neoantigens and more heterogeneity than B16F10 tumors, we hypothesized that de novo T cell priming and any abscopal effects could be augmented by the inclusion of an immunogenic cell death–directing agent like the tumor-targeting antibody TA99 (1, 4244).

We induced tumors on the right flank of BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl mice and waited to treat until large black lesions had formed. In the absence of therapy, the initially flat pigmented lesions progressed to large masses. However, treatment with intratumoral IL12-MSA-Lumican and Lumican-MSA-IL2 alongside systemic anti–PD-1 and TA99 halted tumor growth (Fig. 5, A and B).

Fig. 5 Collagen-anchoring IL-2 and IL-12, anti–PD-1, and TA99 control large BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl tumors.

Melanoma in BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl mice was initiated by application of 4-hydroxytamoxifen on the right flank on day 0. (A) Tumor volume (mean + SD) of tumor-bearing mice treated either with an intratumoral injection of PBS (n = 4) or with intratumoral collagen-anchoring cytokines Lumican-MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA-Lumican and intraperitoneal TA99 and anti–PD-1 (n = 5) on days 25, 31, 37, 43, 49, 55, and 61. For each group, tumor volume shown until a mouse reaches the euthanasia criterion (>1200 mm3). (B) Representative images of BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl flank tumors at onset of indicated treatment on day 25 (top) and before the sixth treatment on day 55 (bottom). (C) Overall survival of tumor-bearing mice treated with intratumoral PBS (n = 10), with intratumoral Lumican-MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA-Lumican and intraperitoneal TA99 and anti–PD-1 (n = 14), with intratumoral Lumican-MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA-Lumican and intraperitoneal anti–PD-1 (n = 10), with intratumoral MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA and intraperitoneal TA99 and anti–PD-1 (n = 9), or with intratumoral MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA and intraperitoneal anti–PD-1 (n = 8) on days 25, 31, 37, 43, 49, 55, and 61. Arrowheads indicate times of treatment. Overall survival graph enumerates mice that succumbed to tumor burden (>1200 mm3) or to treatment-related weight loss (>20%); the latter is indicated by a blue “×” for each mouse. Survival was compared by log-rank Mantel-Cox test. *P < 0.03, ***P < 0.0002, ****P < 0.0001.

Despite its efficacy in this difficult-to-treat GEMM, the translatability of this combination treatment is limited by the dearth of clinically available tumor-targeting antibodies. Comparing the overall survival of BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl tumor–bearing mice treated with anti–PD-1 and collagen-anchoring IL-2 and IL-12 with or without TA99, we found that TA99 was not a necessary component for efficacy (Fig. 5C). These results affirm our earlier findings (Fig. 4) that IL-2, IL-12, and checkpoint blockade can be an effective tumor-agnostic combination treatment.

In addition, we found that tumor control in this model could also be achieved using unanchored cytokines in lieu of collagen-anchoring cytokines but at the cost of major and potentially lethal toxicity. One-third of the mice treated with IL12-MSA and MSA-IL2 were euthanized because of >20% loss of body weight, whereas no mice treated with IL12-MSA-Lumican and Lumican-MSA-IL2 succumbed to treatment-related toxicity (Fig. 5C). With collagen anchoring, this potent tumor-agnostic combination treatment can safely improve overall survival (Fig. 5C).


It has been an outstanding challenge to unleash cytokines’ antitumor therapeutic efficacy without exacerbating toxicity. Here, we demonstrate that collagen-anchoring of IL-2 and IL-12 by fusion to lumican is a tumor-agnostic protein-based strategy to potentiate immunotherapy while also ameliorating systemic toxicity.

The inherent challenge of limiting exposure of patients to systemic cytokines has prompted investigation into local administration of wild-type cytokines. Studies, however, show that a local injection does not prevent cytokine leakage. In humans, high concentrations of IL-12 (2) and IL-2 (3) were measured in circulation 3 hours after subcutaneous/intratumoral administration, thereby undermining the posited advantages (high concentration and low toxicity) of local delivery. The rapid escape of locally injected wild-type cytokines out of the tumor is largely a consequence of their small size (IL-2 is 16 kDa and IL-12 is 57 kDa). Among the improvements made to cytokines, fusion to large biomolecules such as albumin or polyethylene glycol has been successfully used to extend cytokine persistence in circulation (19). Although cytokine fusion to MSA (MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA) analogously increases passive tumor retention upon local injection, we found the efficacy and safety profile of combinations with MSA-cytokine fusions consistently inferior to those achieved using Lumican-MSA–cytokine fusions. Local delivery and prolonged passive size-based retention do not endow cytokines with the prolonged intratumoral persistence or systemic isolation necessary to maximize therapeutic index.

There have been numerous efforts to improve the therapeutic index of cytokines by targeting. Most commonly, cytokines have been fused to tumor-targeting antibodies, a format called immunocytokines. However, such immunocytokines, generally, first extend a cytokine’s systemic exposure before diffusion into the tumor (20) and, as a result, often still suffer from dose-limiting systemic toxicities (45, 46). Smaller immunocytokines may demonstrate better tumor-targeting efficiency due to rapid renal clearance (20, 47) but may also therefore require frequent dosing to maintain therapeutic intratumoral concentrations. At first glance, administering immunocytokines intratumorally may seem like a solution. However, nearly all clinical tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies engage cell surface receptors that undergo internalization (48). The steady-state internalization of these cellular targets undercuts a cytokine’s receptor–accessible tumor residence time and efficacy. Targeting an acellular antigen, such as a component of the extracellular matrix, minimizes constitutive target-mediated depletion of a cytokine fusion (49). Currently, tumor-targeting scFv against splice variants of the matrix proteins fibronectin and tenascin-C are under development as fusions to IL-2 and tumor necrosis factor–α (50). Preclinical investigation of these agents had primarily relied on systemic routes of administration. However, in a phase 2 clinical trial, these immunocytokines were administered intralesionally and were well tolerated with moderate efficacy (50, 51). Although their local administration is promising, immunocytokines are also generally restricted and dose limited by variable target expression (46, 52) unlike collagen, a ubiquitous and highly abundant protein.

Although both tumors and healthy tissues contain collagen, intratumoral administration eliminates the need to target a tumor-specific antigen. Instead, to maximize retention and confinement of our cytokine payload, we prioritized high abundance (8) and slow turnover (49) when selecting our target. Collagen types I and IV are among the most prevalent components of the matrix in most tissues and tumors (8). Although collagen density varies across tumor types, lumican-cytokines proved efficacious in tumor models with <3% collagen (B16F10 and BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl), 5% collagen (MC38), 10% collagen (EMT6), and 20% collagen (4T1) (7, 53). These tumor models include all three immune phenotypes: desert (B16F10 and BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl), excluded (MC38 and EMT6), and inflamed (4T1) (40). Collagen-anchoring is therefore a tumor-agnostic strategy permissive to a range of collagen density and to differential immune infiltration status.

Collagen types I and IV demonstrate distinct intratumoral spatial distributions that may have also contributed to the improved therapeutic efficacy of lumican-cytokine fusions. Collagen type I deposition at the tumor’s invasive margin has been clinically observed in several cancers including breast (54), colorectal (55), and skin (56). Typically, the invasive margin has more immune cells, particularly T cells, compared to the center of the tumor (57). Matrix-embedded lymphocytes also preferentially “crawl” along collagen fibers (58). Therefore, by anchoring to collagen type I, lumican-cytokines are effectively concentrated in areas dense with effector lymphocytes and potentially along their migration tracks. In addition, lumican colocalization with collagen type IV at the basement membrane of blood vessels may poise lumican-cytokines to stimulate extravasating immune cells (50, 59, 60). The exact impact of alternative spatial distribution (localization to collagen type I versus collagen type IV) on the therapy-potentiating effects remains to be determined.

Clinical translation of intratumorally administered therapies is growing rapidly: Small-molecule agonists (61), plasmids, and viruses (62) have all been intratumorally administered into stage III/IV melanoma tumors. For translation to other indications, the issue is whether the return on investment (in terms of improved efficacy and reduced toxicity) is worth the increased logistical effort of intratumoral administration. Another concern for locoregional immunotherapy is the effective control of disseminated metastases. In this regard, our demonstration of durable and systemic antitumor responses in a contralateral noninjected tumor and neoadjuvant reduction of postresection metastases is encouraging. These results suggest that robust local immune stimulation may be essential for curative abscopal effects. It is likely that the greatest benefits will be obtained by combining both systemic and localized therapies, such that a vigorous local immune activation can engender a systemic adaptive response that cooperates with systemic therapy.

To demonstrate the concept of collagen-anchoring localization, we limited our investigation to two cytokines: IL-2 and IL-12. Furthermore, the dosing of IL-2 and IL-12 or their molar ratio had not been empirically optimized. These cytokines may benefit from further investigation, and other immunotherapies altogether may benefit from tumor localization. Fortunately, as a tumor- and payload-agnostic platform, lumican is amenable to fusion to other immunomodulatory payloads and translation to several solid tumors.


Study design

The objectives of this work were to (i) develop a generalizable recombinant protein strategy that relies on collagen-anchoring to improve the therapeutic index of locally injected cytokines and (ii) compare the efficacy and toxicity of intratumorally injected collagen-anchoring cytokines to unanchored cytokines in combination treatments. Multiple individuals on separate occasions recombinantly expressed and purified the cytokine fusion proteins for therapeutic studies in mice. The studies conducted in subcutaneous syngeneic B16F10 tumors tested for potentiation of a systemic immunotherapy by local cytokine therapy as well as compared the effectiveness and safety of collagen-anchoring cytokines to nonanchoring cytokines. The therapeutic studies conducted in subcutaneous MC38, EMT6, and 4T1 tumors assess the tumor-agnostic efficacy of collagen-anchoring cytokines. The BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl melanoma GEMM demonstrated the translatability of collagen-anchoring cytokines in a clinically relevant model.

In all studies, tumor-bearing mice were randomized before the first treatment to ensure similar tumor sizes across treatment groups and were monitored for tumor size and weight loss until euthanasia. We did not use a power analysis to preemptively calculate sample size. Experimental cohorts were composed of at least five but typically seven mice per group; experiments were typically repeated at least twice, and results were pooled for analysis. For each experiment, numbers of mice and experimental replicates are stated in the figure legends. Samples were not excluded from analysis, and investigators were not blinded during the experiments.


B6 mice (C57BL/6NTac) and Balb/C (BALB/cAnNTac) were purchased from Taconic, and Batf3−/− [B6.129S(C)-Batf3tm1Kmm/J] were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Balb/C mice used in 4T1 orthotopic tumor model were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Tyr:Cre-ER+/LSL-BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl mice (designated BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl) were generated by T. F. Gajewski (University of Chicago) from mouse strains obtained from L. Chin, M. MacMahon, and T. Mak. Batf3−/− and BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl mice were bred in-house and genotyped (Transnetyx). All animal work was conducted under the approval of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Comparative Medicine in accordance with federal, state, and local guidelines.


B16F10, EMT6, and 4T1 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). 4T1-GFP-Luc (4T1-Luc) cells were generated by transfection of the 4T1 cell line with pGreenFire lentiviral vector (System Biosciences). Apigmented B16F10 cells were generated by deleting tyrosinase-related protein-2 (TRP2), henceforth B16F10-TRP2 knockout (KO) (18). MC38 cells were a gift from J. Schlom (National Cancer Institute). Tumor cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (ATCC) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Human embryonic kidney–293 cells purchased from Life Technologies were cultured in FreeStyle medium (Life Technologies). Cells isolated from the spleen or blood of B6 mice were cultured in RPMI 1640 (ATCC) with 10% FBS, 20 mM Hepes, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Life Technologies), penicillin (100 U/ml; Life Technologies), streptomycin (100 μg/ml; Life Technologies), 2 mM l-alanyl-l-glutamine (Life Technologies), and 1× minimal essential medium nonessential amino acids (Corning). CTLL-2 cells purchased from ATCC were cultured in the same medium with 10% T cell culture supplement with concanavalin A (T-STIM with ConA, Corning). All cells and cell assays were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2. All cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma.

Subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor inoculation and treatments

Mice were aged for 6 to 8 weeks before subcutaneous or orthotopic tumor inoculation. For inoculation of single B16F10, B16F10-TRP2KO, MC38, and EMT6 tumors, 106 cells in 50 μl of sterile PBS (Corning) were injected subcutaneously into the right flanks of C57BL/6 or Balb/C female mice with the exception of the CAR-T cell therapy study, where 0.5 × 106 B16F10 cells were used. For the orthotopic model, 0.5 × 106 4T1-Luc cells in sterile PBS were injected into the mammary gland of Balb/C female. For Fig. 2G, 106 B16F10 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank, denoted as ipsilateral, and 0.3 × 106 B16F10 cells were injected subcutaneously into the left flank, denoted as contralateral.

TA99 was administered at 100 μg per dose intraperitoneally in 100 μl of sterile PBS, and anti–PD-1 (clone 29F.1A12, BioXCell) was administered intraperitoneally at 200 μg per dose in 50 μl of sterile PBS. Intratumoral treatments into the subcutaneous flank tumors were administered in 20 μl of sterile PBS. For all IL-2 treatments (equivalent of 0.11 nmol used), MSA-IL2 (84 kDa) was administered intratumorally at 9 μg per dose, and Lumican-MSA-IL2 (121 kDa) was administered intratumorally at 13 μg per dose. This IL-2 dose was informed by (i) the previously optimized systemic MSA-IL2 dose (16) and (ii) prediction that ~30% of a systemically injected dose of a cytokine fusion protein achieves tumor localization (20). For most IL-12 treatments (equivalent of 14 pmol used), IL12-MSA (126 kDa) was administered intratumorally at 1.78 μg per dose, and IL12-MSA-Lumican (163 kDa) was administered intratumorally at 2.3 μg per dose. However, for Fig. 3 (A and B), the IL-12 dose used was 140 pmol. For the 4T1-Luc orthotopic surgery model in Fig. 3E, the IL-12 dose used was 30 pmol, such that 1.9 μg per dose of scIL12 (60 kDa) and 4.9 μg per dose of IL12-MSA-Lumican (163 kDa) were administered in 30 μl of sterile PBS alongside 200 μg of anti–PD-1 (clone RMP1-14, BioXCell) in 50 μl of sterile PBS.

The vaccine, composed of 90 μg of TTR-Trp1-EGP (30) and 50 μg of cyclic dinucleotides (Invivogen), was administered subcutaneously at the base of the tail, with half of the dose given on each side. CAR-T cell therapy entailed a tail vein intravenous injection of 10 million mixed CD3+ cells into mice preconditioned with 500 cGy of sublethal total body irradiation.

During therapeutic studies, mice were monitored continuously for weight changes and tumor growth by direct measurement or in vivo imaging until the euthanasia end point was reached: either 20% total body weight loss or 100 mm2 tumor area (length × width) for B16F10, MC38, and EMT6 models or metastasis-related morbidity in orthotopic 4T1 model. Mice that rejected tumors were rechallenged with 105 matched tumor cells on the left flank.

Surgical resection of 4T1-Luc primary tumor and subsequent metastasis monitoring

Surgical resection of primary 4T1-Luc tumor was performed 16 days after tumor inoculation. Mice were completely anesthetized with isoflurane, subcutaneously sustained-release buprenorphine (1 mg/kg body weight, ZooPharm), and meloxicam (2 mg/kg body weight). The shaved surgical area was sterilized with alternating swabbing of betadine surgical scrub and 70% ethanol. The tumor and surrounding mammary fat pad was removed by blunt dissection using autoclaved surgical instruments (Braintree Scientific). Wounds were closed using 4-0 nylon monofilament sutures with a 3/8 reverse cutting needle (Ethilon). Mice were dosed with meloxicam (2 mg/kg body weight) at 24-hour intervals for 3 days after surgery. Sutures were removed at 7 to 10 days after the operation.

Mice were monitored for development of metastasis using bioluminescence imaging starting at 10 to 14 days after surgical resection of the primary tumor. Animals were injected intraperitoneally with sterile-filtered d-luciferin (Xenogen) in PBS (150 mg/kg body weight in 200 μl) and imaged 10 min after d-luciferin injection with the IVIS Spectrum Imaging System 100 (IVIS, Xenogen). Animals were monitored daily for morbidity and euthanized if signs of distress, >20% body weight loss, or poor body condition (at veterinary staff discretion) were observed.

In vivo protein retention and pharmacokinetics

Proteins were labeled with Alexa Fluor 647 N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Life Technologies). Excess dye was removed using a PD10 desalting column (GE Healthcare), and degree of labeling for each protein was calculated. Proteins compared in pharmacokinetic and retention studies contained equimolar dye. Lumican-MSA and MSA, 1.1 nmol each (110 μg of Lumican-MSA and 71.7 μg of MSA), were injected intratumorally into mice bearing B16F10-TRP2KO tumors 5 days after tumor inoculation. For Lumican-MSA-IL2 and MSA-IL2 and for IL12-MSA-Lumican and IL12-MSA, 0.11 nmol and 140 pmol of construct, respectively, were injected.

To assess protein retention, mice were imaged with IVIS under auto-exposure epi-illumination fluorescence settings. During this time, mice were maintained on an alfalfa-free casein chow (Test Diet) to minimize gastrointestinal background fluorescence. Image analysis to determine total radiant efficiency was performed using Living Image (Caliper Life Sciences).

To assess pharmacokinetics after injection, <10 μl of blood was drawn into glass microhematocrit heparin-coated tubes (VWR International) from the tip of the tail at indicated time points. Tubes were parafilm-sealed at one end and stored upright protected from the light at 4°C to allow serum separation from clotted blood by gravity. Tubes were scanned using a flatbed Typhoon Trio Variable Mode Imager (GE Healthcare), and serum fluorescence was quantified using Fiji image analysis software.

Antibody-mediated depletions

Cellular subsets were depleted by intraperitoneal administration of depleting antibody beginning 1 day before the first treatment until 1 week after the last treatment. CD8 T cells, NK cells, or neutrophils were depleted with 400 μg of anti–CD8-α (2.43, BioXCell), anti-NK1.1 (PK136, BioXCell), or anti–Ly-6G (1A8, BioXCell) every 4 days. Macrophages or IFN-γ were depleted using 300 μg of anti–colony-stimulating-factor-1-receptor (CSF1R) (AFS98, BioXCell) or 200 μg of anti–IFN-γ (XMG1.2, BioXCell) every other day. Eosinophils were depleted using 1 mg of anti–IL-5 (TRFK5, BioXCell) weekly.

Induction and treatment of BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl autochthonous melanoma

Six- to 15-week-old Tyr:Cre-ER+/LSL-BrafV600E/Ptenfl/fl mice were painted with 5 μl of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (Sigma) at 5 mg/ml dissolved in acetone on the right flank on day 0. On day 25, mice were treated with TA99 at 100 μg per dose intraperitoneally in 100 μl of sterile PBS, and anti–PD-1 (clone 29F.1A12, BioXCell) at 200 μg per dose intraperitoneally in 50 μl of sterile PBS. For IL-2 treatment (equivalent of 0.33 nmol), 39 μg per dose of Lumican-MSA-IL2 or 27 μg per dose of MSA-IL2 was administered intratumorally. For IL-12 treatment (equivalent of 42 pmol), 6.9 μg per dose of IL12-MSA-Lumican or 5.4 μg per dose of IL12-MSA was administered intratumorally. Intratumoral injections were administered in 80 μl of sterile PBS along four distinct needle tracks. Tumor size was measured as volume (length × width × height), and mice were euthanized when tumors exceeded 1200 mm3 or if body weight loss from treatment onset exceeded 20%.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 8 software. Weight changes and other comparisons between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by log-rank Mantel-Cox test. Significance was represented as follows: *P < 0.03, **P < 0.002, ***P < 0.0002, ****P < 0.0001, and not significant. The n values and specific statistical methods are indicated in figure legends. Original data are presented in data file S1.


Materials and Methods

Fig. S1. Expressibility criterion hones potential collagen-binding proteins to lumican.

Fig. S2. Recombinant lumican is stable and monomeric.

Fig. S3. Collagen types I and IV are abundantly expressed in several syngeneic murine tumor models.

Fig. S4. Molecular weight and collagen affinity contribute to intratumoral retention.

Fig. S5. Recombinant lumican is amenable to C-terminal IL-2 fusion.

Fig. S6. Lumican-MSA-IL2 and MSA-IL2 have identical bioactivity.

Fig. S7. IL-2 or TA99 as monotherapies impart limited survival enhancement.

Fig. S8. Intranodal administration of Lumican-MSA-IL2 is insufficient for survival.

Fig. S9. Individual innate immune populations appear dispensable for treatment efficacy of TA99 and Lumican-MSA-IL2.

Fig. S10. TA99 and Lumican-MSA-IL2 induced systemic tumor-specific cellular immunity and established protective memory.

Fig. S11. Recombinant lumican is amenable to N-terminal IL-12 fusion.

Fig. S12. IL-12 demonstrates dose-dependent toxicity and efficacy.

Fig. S13. Vaccination yields antigen-specific CD8+ T cells.

Fig. S14. Combination of reduced-dose IL-12 and IL-2 yields supra-additive toxicity.

Fig. S15. Adaptive immunity is critical for therapeutic efficacy of Lumican-MSA-IL2 and IL12-MSA-Lumican treatment.

Fig. S16. IL12-MSA-Lumican and Lumican-MSA-IL2 treatment expands intratumoral and tumor-specific splenic CD8+ T cells.

Fig. S17. Collagen-anchoring cytokines are not immunogenic.

Table S1. Lumican and cytokine fusion protein sequences.

Data file S1. Original data.


Acknowledgments: We thank the staff of the Swanson Biotechnology Center at the Koch Institute for technical assistance and J. Scholm and T. F. Gajewski for critical reagents. Funding: This work was funded by the National Cancer Institute Grant NCI CA174795. N.M. is supported by the NIH/NIGMS Biotechnology Training Program and NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. Author contributions: N.M. designed experiments. N.M., N.K.M., N.R.B., L.M., M.M.C., J.R.P., E.A.L., and B.K. performed experiments. D.J.I. and S.S. provided reagents and advice. N.M. and K.D.W. interpreted results and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: N.M., J.R.P., M.M.C., and K.D.W. are inventors on U.S. Provisional Patent application no. 62/738,981 regarding the aforementioned collagen-anchoring immunomodulatory molecules and methods thereof. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data associated with this study are present in the paper or Supplementary Materials.
View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science Translational Medicine

Navigate This Article