Research ArticleImmunotherapy

CMV-specific T cells generated from naïve T cells recognize atypical epitopes and may be protective in vivo

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Translational Medicine  29 Apr 2015:
Vol. 7, Issue 285, pp. 285ra63
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2546

You are currently viewing the abstract.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution

Sourcing CMV immunotherapy

Immunotherapy—such as adoptive T cell therapy—is making headway in treating cancer, autoimmunity, and infectious disease. Indeed, adoptive transfer of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific T cells can restore immunity to the virus. However, these cells have been primarily derived from memory cells from CMV-seropositive individuals, which limits the donor pool. Now, Hanley et al. demonstrate that CMV-specific T cells can be derived from naïve T cells taken from CMV-seronegative people. These cells react to different epitopes than the memory cell–derived T cells but with similar avidity. What’s more, these cells were associated with periods of CMV-free survival when transplanted into patients. These data support expanded trials of adoptive therapy of CMV-restricted T cells from seronegative donors.

Abstract

Adoptive transfer of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific T cells derived from adult seropositive donors can effectively restore antiviral immunity after transplantation. However, CMV-seronegative donors lack CMV-specific memory T cells, which restricts the availability of virus-specific T cells for immunoprophylaxis. We demonstrate the feasibility of deriving CMV-specific T cells from naïve cells for T cell therapy. Naïve T cells primed to recognize CMV were restricted to different, atypical epitopes than T cells derived from CMV-seropositive individuals; however, these two cell populations had similar avidities. CMV-seropositive individuals also had T cells recognizing these atypical epitopes, but these cells had a lower avidity than those derived from the seronegative subjects, which suggests that high-avidity T cells to these epitopes may be lost over time. Indeed, recipients of cord blood (CB) grafts who did not develop CMV were found by clonotypic analysis to have T cells recognizing atypical CMVpp65 epitopes. Therefore, we examined unmanipulated CB units and found that T cells with T cell receptors restricted by atypical epitopes were the most common, which may explain why these T cells expanded. When infused to recipients, naïve donor–derived virus-specific T cells that recognized atypical epitopes were associated with prolonged periods of CMV-free survival and complete remission. These data suggest that naïve-derived T cells from seronegative patients may be an additional source of cells for CMV immunoprophylaxis.

View Full Text